Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 32/56] rockchip: pinctrl: rk3368: move IOMUX bit-definitions to pinctrl driver

2017-07-28 Thread Dr. Philipp Tomsich
> On 28 Jul 2017, at 05:38, Simon Glass wrote: > > On 26 July 2017 at 04:40, Philipp Tomsich > wrote: >> There is no real reason to keep the bit-definitions for the IOMUX in >> the grf header file (which defines the register layout of the GRF block): >> these should only be used by our pinctrl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 32/56] rockchip: pinctrl: rk3368: move IOMUX bit-definitions to pinctrl driver

2017-07-27 Thread Simon Glass
On 26 July 2017 at 04:40, Philipp Tomsich wrote: > There is no real reason to keep the bit-definitions for the IOMUX in > the grf header file (which defines the register layout of the GRF block): > these should only be used by our pinctrl driver (with the possible > exception of early debug-init c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 32/56] rockchip: pinctrl: rk3368: move IOMUX bit-definitions to pinctrl driver

2017-07-26 Thread Philipp Tomsich
There is no real reason to keep the bit-definitions for the IOMUX in the grf header file (which defines the register layout of the GRF block): these should only be used by our pinctrl driver (with the possible exception of early debug-init code in TPL/SPL). This moves the relevant definitions from