Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/20] spl: fix binman_sym output check

2018-03-31 Thread Simon Glass
On 13 March 2018 at 21:36, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 08:51:43PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: >> A previous commit introduced the use of binman in the SPL. >> >> After the binman_sym call over the 'pos' symbol, the output value is >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/20] spl: fix binman_sym output check

2018-03-20 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 02:36:06PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 08:51:43PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > A previous commit introduced the use of binman in the SPL. > > > > After the binman_sym call over the 'pos' symbol, the output value is > > checked

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/20] spl: fix binman_sym output check

2018-03-13 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Simon, On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 08:51:43PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > A previous commit introduced the use of binman in the SPL. > > After the binman_sym call over the 'pos' symbol, the output value is > checked against BINMAN_SYM_MISSING (-1UL). According to the > documentation

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/20] spl: fix binman_sym output check

2018-02-28 Thread Miquel Raynal
A previous commit introduced the use of binman in the SPL. After the binman_sym call over the 'pos' symbol, the output value is checked against BINMAN_SYM_MISSING (-1UL). According to the documentation (tools/binman/README), when it comes to the 'pos' attribute: pos: This sets the