Hi Benoît,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> I have seen other PRs going through, but nothing for this series.
> Please do not forget.
It has already been applied in master now :-)
___
U-Boot
Hi Stefano, Tom,
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 02:22, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:44:40PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> Hi Stefano and Tom,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Fabio Estevam
Hi Tom,
On 07/11/2017 02:22, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:44:40PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi Stefano and Tom,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> From: Fabio Estevam
>>>
>>> The motivation for moving
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:44:40PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Stefano and Tom,
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > From: Fabio Estevam
> >
> > The motivation for moving MX25 selection to Kconfig is to be
> > able to
Hi Stefano and Tom,
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> The motivation for moving MX25 selection to Kconfig is to be
> able to better handle MX25 specific errata, so that an errata option
> can be selected at
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> The motivation for moving MX25 selection to Kconfig is to be
> able to better handle MX25 specific errata, so that an errata option
> can be selected at SoC level instead of
From: Fabio Estevam
The motivation for moving MX25 selection to Kconfig is to be
able to better handle MX25 specific errata, so that an errata option
can be selected at SoC level instead of board level.
This selection method also aligns with the way other i.MX SoCs are
7 matches
Mail list logo