On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 8:48 PM Abel Vesa wrote:
> So, do I need to resend this with all the R-bs ?
Just realized that you missed to Cc Stefano Babic on
this series.
Stefano,
Should Abel resend this series with you on Cc or can you get review it
from patchwork?
Thanks
On 19-02-04 08:19:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:03:43AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Abel Vesa wrote:
> >
> > > If the SPL size (without the dtb appended) is larger then yes, the build
> > > fails.
> > > Trouble is if the SPL (without the dtb
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:21:37PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019, 16:16 hat Abel Vesa geschrieben:
>
> > On 19-02-04 08:19:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:03:43AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Abel Vesa wrote:
>
Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019, 16:16 hat Abel Vesa geschrieben:
> On 19-02-04 08:19:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:03:43AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Abel Vesa wrote:
> > >
> > > > If the SPL size (without the dtb appended) is larger then yes,
On 19-02-04 08:19:23, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:03:43AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Abel Vesa wrote:
> >
> > > If the SPL size (without the dtb appended) is larger then yes, the build
> > > fails.
> > > Trouble is if the SPL (without the dtb
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:03:43AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Abel Vesa wrote:
>
> > If the SPL size (without the dtb appended) is larger then yes, the build
> > fails.
> > Trouble is if the SPL (without the dtb appended) is, lets say, 63kB and
> > then the dtb
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Abel Vesa wrote:
> If the SPL size (without the dtb appended) is larger then yes, the build
> fails.
> Trouble is if the SPL (without the dtb appended) is, lets say, 63kB and
> then the dtb is larger than 1kB. Then there is no mechanism in place to check
> that
>
On 19-02-02 07:50:28, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Abel,
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Abel Vesa wrote:
> >
> > The third version is here:
> >
Hi Abel,
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Abel Vesa wrote:
>
> The third version is here:
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-January/356903.html
>
> So, this time I hope I got it right. Before, I was stupidly trying
> to put a fit in another fit without a really good reason. To my
>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:40:05PM +, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The third version is here:
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-January/356903.html
>
> So, this time I hope I got it right. Before, I was stupidly trying
> to put a fit in another fit without a really good reason. To my
>
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:59 PM Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Is Ethernet functional?
>
> I haven't tested the ethernet on all of them, just one of each
> (sabresd/sabreauto).
>
> I'll test them all when I get back at the office tomorrow.
Don't worry about that. If you tested in one of each then it is
On 19-02-01 15:13:32, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Abel,
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Abel Vesa wrote:
> >
> > The third version is here:
> >
Hi Abel,
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Abel Vesa wrote:
>
> The third version is here:
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-January/356903.html
>
> So, this time I hope I got it right. Before, I was stupidly trying
> to put a fit in another fit without a really good reason. To my
>
The third version is here:
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-January/356903.html
So, this time I hope I got it right. Before, I was stupidly trying
to put a fit in another fit without a really good reason. To my
excuse, that was working even with the spl_image->os set to 0,
bug which I
14 matches
Mail list logo
