Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201209212124.05075.ma...@denx.de you wrote:
Leave u-boot.bin be, that's the u-boot binary ... the new name might be u-
boot.img (as in flash image), what do you say ?
Please re-read my earlier posting here:
Hi Wolfgang,
On 09/21/2012 06:43 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message 5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com you
wrote:
If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
U-Boot. There's an intermediate file (u-boot-dtb.bin) that I assume
is
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
In message 505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt you wrote:
It is very important to me that we do NOT include any architectures,
SoCs, or board specifc parts in the names because this will cause
major PITA for all kind of automatic test suites etc.
To me this seems also a
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
In message 505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt you wrote:
It is very important to me that we do NOT include any architectures,
SoCs, or board specifc parts in the names because this will cause
major PITA for all kind of automatic test suites etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/12 08:52, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
In message 505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt you wrote:
It is very important to me that we do NOT include any
architectures, SoCs, or board specifc parts in the names
because this
On 21-09-2012 17:13, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/12 08:52, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
In message 505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt you wrote:
It is very important to me that we do NOT include any
architectures, SoCs, or board specifc
Hello Tom,
Tom Rini wrote on 2012-09-21:
SoC specific make rules can probably be added to the respective SoC
specific makefiles, thus still avoiding to clutter the top level
Makefile with lots of conditionals.
Ideally? Yes, Possible today? Not sure. I have a hazy recollection
that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/12 09:26, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
On 21-09-2012 17:13, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/12 08:52, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear José Miguel Gonçalves,
In message 505c21bb.7000...@inov.pt you
On 09/21/2012 12:43:48 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message
5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com you
wrote:
If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
U-Boot. There's an intermediate file (u-boot-dtb.bin) that I assume
is
Dear Scott Wood,
On 09/21/2012 12:43:48 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom,
In message
5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com you
wrote:
If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
U-Boot. There's an intermediate file
On 09/21/2012 01:43:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
The awkwardness with naming based on nand/onenand/sd is that we no
longer have build infrastructure that is specific to the type of
boot
device -- and IIRC with some of the newer SPL targets, the same
image
works on multiple
Dear Scott Wood,
On 09/21/2012 01:43:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
The awkwardness with naming based on nand/onenand/sd is that we no
longer have build infrastructure that is specific to the type of
boot
device -- and IIRC with some of the newer SPL targets,
On 09/21/2012 02:24:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
On 09/21/2012 01:43:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
The awkwardness with naming based on nand/onenand/sd is that we
no
longer have build infrastructure that is specific to the type of
boot
device --
-Original Message-
From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@ti.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:29 PM
To: José Miguel Gonçalves
Cc: Scott Wood; u-boot@lists.denx.de; ma...@denx.de; mk7.k...@samsung.com;
Tom Warren
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] Add u-boot-pad.bin target to the Makefile
; Tom Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11]
Add u-boot-pad.bin target to the Makefile
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On 09/19/12 17:38, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Tom Scott,
On 09/20/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 16:36
Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] Add
u-boot-pad.bin target to the Makefile
Old Signed by an unknown key
On 09/19/12 17:38, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Tom Scott,
On 09/20/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 16:36
v4 10/11] Add u-boot-pad.bin target to the
Makefile
Tom W, since I'd like you to upgrade the tegra rules after this
change goes
in (since they do a u-boot-spl.bin + pad + u-boot.bin + stuff),
does this
look good to you as well? Thanks!
I'm not clear what you want the final binary names
...@samsung.com;
Tom Warren
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] Add u-boot-pad.bin target to the Makefile
Tom W, since I'd like you to upgrade the tegra rules after this change goes
in (since they do a u-boot-spl.bin + pad + u-boot.bin + stuff), does this
look good to you as well? Thanks!
I'm not clear what you
Dear Tom,
In message 5fbf8e85ca34454794f0f7ecba79798f379f6fd...@hqmail04.nvidia.com you
wrote:
If you flash u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin, you'll get a fully functioning
U-Boot. There's an intermediate file (u-boot-dtb.bin) that I assume
is u-boot.bin+dtb - I'm not sure why it's left around - Allen
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves jose.goncal...@inov.pt
---
Changes for v2:
- None
Changes for v3:
- Changed new binary target name from u-boot-ubl.bin to u-boot-pad.bin
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
I still think pad is a lousy name for this. It refers to a minor
implementation detail of how the image was put together.
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
I still think pad is a lousy name for this. It refers to a minor
implementation
On 09/19/2012 11:58:06 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
I still think pad is a lousy
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
I still think pad is a lousy
On 19-09-2012 18:08, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 11:58:06 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a
On 09/19/2012 01:19:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this
On 19-09-2012 19:19, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:36:50PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 01:19:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:11:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/19/2012 10:58 AM, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote:
On 19-09-2012 17:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM,
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary image
with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves jose.goncal...@inov.pt
---
Changes for v2:
- None
Changes for v3:
- Changed new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary
image with a padded SPL concatenated with U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves
On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary
image with a padded SPL concatenated with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 16:36, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs
Tom Scott,
On 09/20/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 16:36, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 15:39, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:25:26 AM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 17:38, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Tom Scott,
On 09/20/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/12 16:36, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:31:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
35 matches
Mail list logo
