Hi Stefano,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> I worked on converting this patch to using the existing DDR setup functions:
> https://pastebin.com/6PGx0pMx
>
> However I do see instability: after lauching the kernel I see a hang
> after "Starting the kernel..." sometimes.
>
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>
>> mmhhh...it looks to me we are diverging with this SOC. I understand that
>> current funtions are not suitable for the new SOC. However, we were able
>> to
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> mmhhh...it looks to me we are diverging with this SOC. I understand that
> current funtions are not suitable for the new SOC. However, we were able
> to manage up now to write tables (mx6dq_iomux_ddr_regs) and use
> functions to
Hi Fabio,
On 02/10/2017 20:47, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> Add support for the latest MX6QP wandboard variant.
>
> Based on Richard Hu's work from Technexion's U-Boot tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Rebased against latest u-boot-imx
>
>
From: Fabio Estevam
Add support for the latest MX6QP wandboard variant.
Based on Richard Hu's work from Technexion's U-Boot tree.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
Changes since v3:
- Rebased against latest u-boot-imx
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h | 3 +
board/wandboard/spl.c
5 matches
Mail list logo
