] generic board patch of manual reloc and
zero gd_t
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 19:05 +0800, FengHua wrote:
How about place u-boot.bin at 0x9000 and write a piece of code (elf
format)
jumping from 0x8000 to 0x9000.
That seems even worse than converting the .bin back
-原始邮件-
发件人: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
发送时间: 2013年10月1日 星期二
收件人: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn
抄送: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org, trini tr...@ti.com, u-boot
u-boot@lists.denx.de
主题: Re: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc
-原始邮件-
发件人: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
发送时间: 2013年10月1日 星期二
收件人: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
抄送: trini tr...@ti.com, u-boot u-boot@lists.denx.de, FengHua
feng...@phytium.com.cn
主题: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc and zero
gd_t
] generic board patch of manual reloc and
zero gd_t
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 20:54 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
It seems the problem is that when rela is used, the linker *only* puts
the symbol in the rela struct. The value in the data section itself is
zero, which means we can't run without
-原始邮件-
发件人: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
发送时间: 2013年10月1日 星期二
收件人: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn
抄送: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org, trini tr...@ti.com, u-boot
u-boot@lists.denx.de
主题: Re: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc and
zero gd_t
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 20:54 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
It seems the problem is that when rela is used, the linker *only* puts
the symbol in the rela struct. The value in the data section itself is
zero, which means we can't run without relocation even if the address
hasn't changed.
Unless
] generic board patch of manual reloc
and zero gd_t
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:48 AM, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
diff --git a/common/board_r.c b/common/board_r.c
index 86ca1cb..1b4bdd2 100644
??: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn, tr...@ti.com tr...@ti.com,
U-Boot
Mailing List u-boot@lists.denx.de
??: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc
and zero gd_t
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Aug 20
???8???22??? ?
?: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
??: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn, tr...@ti.com tr...@ti.com,
U-Boot
Mailing List u-boot@lists.denx.de
??: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc
and zero gd_t
On Tue, 2013-08-20
-原始邮件-
发件人: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
发送时间: 2013年8月24日 星期六
收件人: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
抄送: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn, trini tr...@ti.com, u-boot
u-boot@lists.denx.de
主题: Re: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc and
zero gd_t
-Boot
Mailing List u-boot@lists.denx.de
??: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc and
zero gd_t
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:48 AM, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
diff --git a/common
Mailing List u-boot@lists.denx.de
??: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc and
zero gd_t
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:48 AM, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
diff --git a/common
-原始邮件-
发件人: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
发送时间: 2013年8月21日 星期三
收件人: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn
抄送: U-Boot Mailing List u-boot@lists.denx.de, tr...@ti.com
tr...@ti.com
主题: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc and zero
gd_t
Hi David,
On Tue
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:27 -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:48 AM, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
diff --git a/common/board_r.c b/common/board_r.c
index 86ca1cb..1b4bdd2 100644
--- a/common/board_r.c
+++ b/common/board_r.c
@@ -157,6 +157,13 @@ static int
-原始邮件-
发件人: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
发送时间: 2013年8月22日 星期四
收件人: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
抄送: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn, tr...@ti.com tr...@ti.com, U-Boot
Mailing List u-boot@lists.denx.de
主题: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] generic board patch of manual reloc
From: David Feng feng...@phytium.com.cn
1. function board_init_f in board_f.c should firstly zero gd_t structure
before it call initcall_run_list, otherwise the debug print will go run
if DEBUG is defined. Because the printf function will use global data
to determine whether serial port
Hi David,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:48 AM, feng...@phytium.com.cn wrote:
From: David Feng feng...@phytium.com.cn
1. function board_init_f in board_f.c should firstly zero gd_t structure
before it call initcall_run_list, otherwise the debug print will go run
if DEBUG is defined.
17 matches
Mail list logo
