On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:55:10PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Am 05.05.2019 um 13:38 schrieb Tom Rini:
> >On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:16:38PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>Tom,
> >>
> >>Am 26.04.2019 um 13:00 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> >>>On 4/26/19 12:19 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>
Am 05.05.2019 um 13:38 schrieb Tom Rini:
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:16:38PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Tom,
Am 26.04.2019 um 13:00 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 4/26/19 12:19 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
On 4/26/19 11:36 AM, Simon
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:16:38PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Am 26.04.2019 um 13:00 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> >On 4/26/19 12:19 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On 4/26/19 11:36 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On
Tom,
Am 26.04.2019 um 13:00 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 4/26/19 12:19 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
On 4/26/19 11:36 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
On 4/26/19 8:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt
On 4/26/19 12:19 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> On 4/26/19 11:36 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
On 4/26/19 8:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Marek Vasut schrieb am
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 4/26/19 11:36 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/26/19 8:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>> Marek Vasut schrieb am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019, 00:22:
> >>>
> On 4/25/19
On 4/26/19 11:36 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> On 4/26/19 8:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> Marek Vasut schrieb am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019, 00:22:
>>>
On 4/25/19 9:22 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> If the malloc range passed to
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 4/26/19 8:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > Marek Vasut schrieb am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019, 00:22:
> >
> >> On 4/25/19 9:22 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>> If the malloc range passed to mem_malloc_init() is at the end of address
> >>>
On 4/26/19 8:19 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Marek Vasut schrieb am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019, 00:22:
>
>> On 4/25/19 9:22 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> If the malloc range passed to mem_malloc_init() is at the end of address
>>> range and 'start + size' overflows to 0, following allocations fail
Marek Vasut schrieb am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019, 00:22:
> On 4/25/19 9:22 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > If the malloc range passed to mem_malloc_init() is at the end of address
> > range and 'start + size' overflows to 0, following allocations fail as
> > mem_malloc_end is zero (which looks like
On 4/25/19 9:22 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> If the malloc range passed to mem_malloc_init() is at the end of address
> range and 'start + size' overflows to 0, following allocations fail as
> mem_malloc_end is zero (which looks like uninitialized).
>
> Fix this by subtracting 1 of 'start +
If the malloc range passed to mem_malloc_init() is at the end of address
range and 'start + size' overflows to 0, following allocations fail as
mem_malloc_end is zero (which looks like uninitialized).
Fix this by subtracting 1 of 'start + size' overflows to zero.
Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt
12 matches
Mail list logo