On 06/19/2017 05:32 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Sel, 2017-06-13 at 11:05 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/13/2017 05:26 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>
>>> On Isn, 2017-06-12 at 16:38 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
On Jum, 2017-06-09 at 08:52 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
On Sel, 2017-06-13 at 11:05 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 05:26 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> >
> > On Isn, 2017-06-12 at 16:38 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jum, 2017-06-09 at 08:52 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 06/09/2017 03:25 AM,
On Sel, 2017-06-13 at 11:05 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 06/13/2017 05:26 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Isn, 2017-06-12 at 16:38 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jum, 2017-06-09 at 08:52 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On
On 06/13/2017 05:26 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Isn, 2017-06-12 at 16:38 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>> On Jum, 2017-06-09 at 08:52 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/09/2017 03:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
I didn't really look since we still have a discussion open
On Isn, 2017-06-12 at 16:38 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Jum, 2017-06-09 at 08:52 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 06/09/2017 03:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I didn't really look since we still have a discussion open on V8
> > > .
> > > There
> > > is no
On Jum, 2017-06-09 at 08:52 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2017 03:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >
> > I didn't really look since we still have a discussion open on V8 .
> > There
> > is no point in sending new versions while discussion is still open.
> > Also, I'd like some review
On 06/09/2017 03:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> I didn't really look since we still have a discussion open on V8 . There
> is no point in sending new versions while discussion is still open.
> Also, I'd like some review from Ley/Dinh
I've reviewed v6 and gave my Reviewed-by. Now I see there's a
On 06/09/2017 05:39 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Kha, 2017-06-08 at 14:14 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/08/2017 05:40 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>
>>
>> Any safety guideline?
>> I checked the spl.map, we still have 10K left after
>> calculation
>>
On Kha, 2017-06-08 at 14:14 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/08/2017 05:40 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Any safety guideline?
> > > > > I checked the spl.map, we still have 10K left after
> > > > > calculation
> > > > > including bss size.
> > > > >
On 06/08/2017 05:40 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
[...]
Any safety guideline?
I checked the spl.map, we still have 10K left after calculation
including bss size.
>>> I compiled all Intel fpga related defconfigs, and we have 9K free
>>> based
>>> on total 64K memory size. SO
On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 14:31 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 01:26 PM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> >
> > On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 16:04 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > >
> > > On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 08:36 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 06/07/2017 05:06 AM, Chee, Tien
On 06/07/2017 01:26 PM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 16:04 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>> On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 08:36 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2017 05:06 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:50 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
On 06/07/2017 10:04 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 08:36 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/07/2017 05:06 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:50 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 06/06/2017 11:46 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>
>
> On Sel,
On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 16:04 +0800, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 08:36 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> > On 06/07/2017 05:06 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:50 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 06/06/2017 11:46 AM,
On Rab, 2017-06-07 at 08:36 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 05:06 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> >
> > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:50 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/06/2017 11:46 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:41 +0200, Marek Vasut
On 06/07/2017 05:06 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:50 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/06/2017 11:46 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:41 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 06/06/2017 11:36 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>
>
> On Sel,
On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:50 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 11:46 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> >
> > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:41 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/06/2017 11:36 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:35 +0200, Marek Vasut
On 06/06/2017 11:46 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:41 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/06/2017 11:36 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:35 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 06/06/2017 10:19 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>
>
> On Sel,
On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 11:41 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 11:36 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> >
> > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:35 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/06/2017 10:19 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:03 +0200, Marek Vasut
On 06/06/2017 11:36 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:35 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/06/2017 10:19 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:03 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 06/06/2017 08:35 AM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>
On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:35 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 10:19 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> >
> > On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:03 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/06/2017 08:35 AM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Tien Fong Chee
On 06/06/2017 10:19 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:03 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 06/06/2017 08:35 AM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Tien Fong Chee
>>>
>>> This patch is for enabling FPGA driver support on SPL
>> Why would we
On Sel, 2017-06-06 at 10:03 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 08:35 AM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote:
> >
> > From: Tien Fong Chee
> >
> > This patch is for enabling FPGA driver support on SPL
> Why would we want that on Gen5 ? I believe this is only needed
On 06/06/2017 08:35 AM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tien Fong Chee
>
> This patch is for enabling FPGA driver support on SPL
Why would we want that on Gen5 ? I believe this is only needed on Gen10.
> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee
From: Tien Fong Chee
This patch is for enabling FPGA driver support on SPL
Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee
---
configs/socfpga_arria5_defconfig | 1 +
configs/socfpga_cyclone5_defconfig | 1 +
configs/socfpga_de0_nano_soc_defconfig |
25 matches
Mail list logo