Hi Tim,
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
This reverts commit 17da7120249bfdef877f46be5bbcb3cc01212eb9.
The i210/i211 do have the SW_FW_SYNC (0x5b5c) register and this is what should
be used when acquiring the semaphore.
I believe the issue that this
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Marcel Ziswiler mar...@ziswiler.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:47 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
Marcel,
Could you give an 'acked-by' if you agree with this series? I would
like to see
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Marcel Ziswiler mar...@ziswiler.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:47 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
Marcel,
Could you give an 'acked-by' if you agree with this series? I would
like to see it merged:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473997/
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:47 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
Marcel,
Could you give an 'acked-by' if you agree with this series? I would
like to see it merged:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473997/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473998/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473996/
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Marcel Ziswiler mar...@ziswiler.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 06:15 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
snip
Tested on Apalis T30 1GB V1.1A with properly fused i211
Tested on Apalis T30 2GB
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 10:01 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
This reverts commit 17da7120249bfdef877f46be5bbcb3cc01212eb9.
The i210/i211 do have the SW_FW_SYNC (0x5b5c) register and this is what should
be used when acquiring the semaphore.
I believe the issue that this patch was trying to resolve
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Tim Harvey thar...@gateworks.com wrote:
This reverts commit 17da7120249bfdef877f46be5bbcb3cc01212eb9.
The i210/i211 do have the SW_FW_SYNC (0x5b5c) register and this is what should
be used when acquiring the semaphore.
I believe the issue that this patch was
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Marcel Ziswiler mar...@ziswiler.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 10:01 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
This reverts commit 17da7120249bfdef877f46be5bbcb3cc01212eb9.
The i210/i211 do have the SW_FW_SYNC (0x5b5c) register and this is what
should
be used when
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 06:15 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
snip
Tested on Apalis T30 1GB V1.1A with properly fused i211
Tested on Apalis T30 2GB V1.1A with iNVM fused i210
Tested on Apalis T30 1GB V1.0A with tools only aka non fused i211
Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler marcel.ziswi...@toradex.com
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Marcel Ziswiler mar...@ziswiler.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 06:15 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
snip
Tested on Apalis T30 1GB V1.1A with properly fused i211
Tested on Apalis T30 2GB V1.1A with iNVM fused i210
Tested on Apalis T30 1GB V1.0A with tools only
This reverts commit 17da7120249bfdef877f46be5bbcb3cc01212eb9.
The i210/i211 do have the SW_FW_SYNC (0x5b5c) register and this is what should
be used when acquiring the semaphore.
I believe the issue that this patch was trying to resolve is now resolved
by properly releasing the semaphore once no
11 matches
Mail list logo
