Hi Kyle,
On 8/30/2010 11:24 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
The Intel 82571EB chipset can be used in an unmanaged configuration as a
fast dual-port Gig-E controller. Unfortunately a board consturcted that
way would fail to correctly come up because the driver polls for the
completion of a
Ben,
I am so sorry... please actually drop this patch. I've been in contact with
Intel regarding the equivalent patch for the Linux kernel and it turns out
this is just a workaround for a misconfiguration in our EEPROMs. The boards
on which I have fixed the EEPROMs do not need this change in
On 9/12/2010 9:24 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Ben,
I am so sorry... please actually drop this patch. I've been in
contact with Intel regarding the equivalent patch for the Linux kernel
and it turns out this is just a workaround for a misconfiguration in
our EEPROMs. The boards on which I
The Intel 82571EB chipset can be used in an unmanaged configuration as a
fast dual-port Gig-E controller. Unfortunately a board consturcted that
way would fail to correctly come up because the driver polls for the
completion of a management cycle that will never occur.
To resolve this problem,
The Intel 82571EB chipset can be used in an unmanaged configuration as a
fast dual-port Gig-E controller. Unfortunately a board consturcted that
way would fail to correctly come up because the driver polls for the
completion of a management cycle that will never occur.
To resolve this problem,
5 matches
Mail list logo
