Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] rules for SPDX-License-Identifier

Hi Tom, On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > Ugh. It also looks like it wouldn't be easy to make it a relaxed check. > So we can either ignore SPDX_LICENSE_TAG in .checkpatch.conf (and be no > worse but not better than before) or a coccinelle script to whack

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] rules for SPDX-License-Identifier

On 04/14/2018 03:57 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 01:08:47PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> With c398f2df7ca4 ("checkpatch.pl: update from Linux kernel v4.16") >> scripts/checkpatch.ps checks if the SPDX license identifier follows the >> rules set forth in >>

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] rules for SPDX-License-Identifier

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 01:08:47PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > With c398f2df7ca4 ("checkpatch.pl: update from Linux kernel v4.16") > scripts/checkpatch.ps checks if the SPDX license identifier follows the > rules set forth in >

[U-Boot] [RFC] rules for SPDX-License-Identifier

With c398f2df7ca4 ("checkpatch.pl: update from Linux kernel v4.16") scripts/checkpatch.ps checks if the SPDX license identifier follows the rules set forth in https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/license-rules.html If the SPDX license identifier is not in the first line or it does not