Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] x86: Intel FSP integration

Hi Bin, On 3 November 2014 20:05, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Thanks for the comments. > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >> Well it's certainly not ideal but from what I can tell these blobs are >> a fact of life on Intel machines still. For the ivybridge

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] x86: Intel FSP integration

Hi Simon, Thanks for the comments. On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Bin, > > Well it's certainly not ideal but from what I can tell these blobs are > a fact of life on Intel machines still. For the ivybridge stuff, I've > found I need a microcode blob, a video BIOS blob a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] x86: Intel FSP integration

Hi Bin, On 2 November 2014 19:26, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I am preparing patches for my U-Boot port on Intel Crown Bay CRB which uses > Intel FSP for the memory and chipset initialization. Intel FSP is a binary > blob inside which 3 pre-defined entry pointes are available for 3rd party >

[U-Boot] [RFC] x86: Intel FSP integration

Hi Simon, I am preparing patches for my U-Boot port on Intel Crown Bay CRB which uses Intel FSP for the memory and chipset initialization. Intel FSP is a binary blob inside which 3 pre-defined entry pointes are available for 3rd party bootloader to call to perform various jobs at different initial