On Thursday 30 July 2009 05:59:07 Detlev Zundel wrote:
It is on my priority list however to assemble a list of all contributors
and ask them if they agree to relicence their contributions under the
FDL.
why not CC-BY-SA ? the wikipedia page has a bunch of references to FDL being
a bad idea,
Hi Robin,
On Tue 28 Jul 2009 17:27, Wolfgang Denk pondered:
Dear John,
in message 1248813631.3915.102.ca...@johns you wrote:
It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates
the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I
Correct. And the
Hi,
In message m2eiryebkk@ohwell.denx.de Detlev Zundel wrote:
...
Not meaning to interpret licensing, but to me that means I can't copy/paste
sections into end product documentation, and ship the product for a fee...
That's how it is currently, yes.
Was that the intent?
Not
On Thu 30 Jul 2009 14:45, Wolfgang DenkVersion 1.3 pondered:
Hi,
In message m2eiryebkk@ohwell.denx.de Detlev Zundel wrote:
...
Not meaning to interpret licensing, but to me that means I
can't copy/paste sections into end product documentation, and ship
the product for a fee...
Dear Robin Getz,
In message 200907301550.40651.rg...@blackfin.uclinux.org you wrote:
I assume - no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
Texts? or did you desire something else?
We don't have such detailed plans yet. I see no need for Invariant
Sections.
Since
On Thu 30 Jul 2009 15:55, Wolfgang Denk pondered:
Dear Robin Getz,
In message 200907301550.40651.rg...@blackfin.uclinux.org you wrote:
I assume - no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
Texts? or did you desire something else?
We don't have such detailed plans
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:27 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear John,
in message 1248813631.3915.102.ca...@johns you wrote:
It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates
the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I
Correct. And the DULG
Hello all,
I've been working on writing a User's Manual generation tool, and before
I get too far I'd like to see if this is something the U-Boot community
would be interested in.
The thought was that everyone needs to develop User's Manuals for their
customers, and there's no reason for us
Dear John Schmoller,
In message cover.1248798202.git.jschmol...@xes-inc.com you wrote:
I've been working on writing a User's Manual generation tool, and before
I get too far I'd like to see if this is something the U-Boot community
would be interested in.
Anything wrong with the User's
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:49 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear John Schmoller,
In message cover.1248798202.git.jschmol...@xes-inc.com you wrote:
I've been working on writing a User's Manual generation tool, and before
I get too far I'd like to see if this is something the U-Boot
Dear John,
in message 1248813631.3915.102.ca...@johns you wrote:
It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates
the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I
Correct. And the DULG itself is a wiki (TWiki at the moment, to be
converted to Foswiki
On Tue 28 Jul 2009 17:27, Wolfgang Denk pondered:
Dear John,
in message 1248813631.3915.102.ca...@johns you wrote:
It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates
the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I
Correct. And the DULG itself
12 matches
Mail list logo
