On Dienstag, 16. August 2016 13:41:21 CEST you wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Am 2016-08-14 03:50, schrieb Stefan Bruens:
> > On Freitag, 12. August 2016 15:16:20 CEST Michael Walle wrote:
> >> All fields were accessed directly instead of using the proper byte
> >> swap
> >> functions. Thus, ext4 write s
Hi Stefan,
Am 2016-08-14 03:50, schrieb Stefan Bruens:
On Freitag, 12. August 2016 15:16:20 CEST Michael Walle wrote:
All fields were accessed directly instead of using the proper byte
swap
functions. Thus, ext4 write support was only usable on little-endian
architectures. Fix this.
Signed-of
Am 2016-08-14 03:50, schrieb Stefan Bruens:
On Freitag, 12. August 2016 15:16:20 CEST Michael Walle wrote:
All fields were accessed directly instead of using the proper byte
swap
functions. Thus, ext4 write support was only usable on little-endian
architectures. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Michae
On Freitag, 12. August 2016 15:16:20 CEST Michael Walle wrote:
> All fields were accessed directly instead of using the proper byte swap
> functions. Thus, ext4 write support was only usable on little-endian
> architectures. Fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle
I have tested this on sandbo
All fields were accessed directly instead of using the proper byte swap
functions. Thus, ext4 write support was only usable on little-endian
architectures. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle
---
Ok this patch is huge, please comment. I know, checkpatch fails because
there are longer lines th
5 matches
Mail list logo
