Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: add --bss-plt to LDFLAGS

2014-09-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On 09/09/2014 09:03 PM, Chris Packham wrote: With some versions of gcc (that we know of 4.6.3 and 4.8.2 are affected) it is necessary to specify --bss-plt to get the final blrl in the _GOT2_TABLE_. Without this the last symbol does not get it's address relocated. For the P2041RDB

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: add --bss-plt to LDFLAGS

2014-09-25 Thread York Sun
On 09/09/2014 09:03 PM, Chris Packham wrote: With some versions of gcc (that we know of 4.6.3 and 4.8.2 are affected) it is necessary to specify --bss-plt to get the final blrl in the _GOT2_TABLE_. Without this the last symbol does not get it's address relocated. For the P2041RDB board this

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: add --bss-plt to LDFLAGS

2014-09-24 Thread York Sun
On 09/09/2014 09:03 PM, Chris Packham wrote: With some versions of gcc (that we know of 4.6.3 and 4.8.2 are affected) it is necessary to specify --bss-plt to get the final blrl in the _GOT2_TABLE_. Without this the last symbol does not get it's address relocated. For the P2041RDB board this

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: add --bss-plt to LDFLAGS

2014-09-10 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Chris Packham judge.pack...@gmail.com wrote on 2014/09/10 06:03:10: With some versions of gcc (that we know of 4.6.3 and 4.8.2 are affected) it is necessary to specify --bss-plt to get the final blrl in the _GOT2_TABLE_. Without this the last symbol does not get it's address relocated. For

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: add --bss-plt to LDFLAGS

2014-09-09 Thread Chris Packham
With some versions of gcc (that we know of 4.6.3 and 4.8.2 are affected) it is necessary to specify --bss-plt to get the final blrl in the _GOT2_TABLE_. Without this the last symbol does not get it's address relocated. For the P2041RDB board this ended up being NetArpWaitTimerStart which caused