Hi Masahiro,
On 26 August 2015 at 22:52, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> Hi Simon
>
> I missed to answer the first of the two.
>
>
> 2015-08-26 12:06 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
>
>> Two more things:
>> - What to do about tests?
>> - Please can you check my patches here and provide your comments:
>>
>> http
Hi Simon
I missed to answer the first of the two.
2015-08-26 12:06 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
> Two more things:
> - What to do about tests?
> - Please can you check my patches here and provide your comments:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/510082/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/510079/
Hi Masahiro,
On 25 August 2015 at 19:42, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
>
> 2015-08-26 11:26 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
>>>
>>>
> + return -EINVAL;
That is normally used for an invalid device tree arg. How about -ENOSYS?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the comment block i
Hi Simon,
2015-08-26 11:26 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
>>
>>
+ return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> That is normally used for an invalid device tree arg. How about -ENOSYS?
>>
>>
>>
>> This is the comment block in U-Boot:
>>
>> #define ENOSYS 38 /* Function not implemented */
>>
Hi Masahiro,
On 25 August 2015 at 00:32, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> Simon,
>
>
> I've just posted v4.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
>
>
> 2015-08-12 23:16 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 10 August 2015 at 10:05, Masahiro Yamada
>> wrote:
>>> This creates a new framework for handling
Simon,
I've just posted v4.
Sorry for the delay.
2015-08-12 23:16 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On 10 August 2015 at 10:05, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>> This creates a new framework for handling of pin control devices,
>> i.e. devices that control different aspects of package pin
Hi Masahiro,
On 21 August 2015 at 14:37, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> Simon,
>
>
> 2015-08-22 2:56 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 12 August 2015 at 08:16, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Masahiro,
>>>
>>> On 10 August 2015 at 10:05, Masahiro Yamada
>>> wrote:
This creates a new fra
Simon,
2015-08-22 2:56 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass :
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On 12 August 2015 at 08:16, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 10 August 2015 at 10:05, Masahiro Yamada
>> wrote:
>>> This creates a new framework for handling of pin control devices,
>>> i.e. devices that control differ
Hi Masahiro,
On 12 August 2015 at 08:16, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On 10 August 2015 at 10:05, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>> This creates a new framework for handling of pin control devices,
>> i.e. devices that control different aspects of package pins.
>>
>> This uclass handles pinmu
Hi Masahiro,
On 10 August 2015 at 10:05, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> This creates a new framework for handling of pin control devices,
> i.e. devices that control different aspects of package pins.
>
> This uclass handles pinmuxing and pin configuration; pinmuxing
> controls switching among silicon
This creates a new framework for handling of pin control devices,
i.e. devices that control different aspects of package pins.
This uclass handles pinmuxing and pin configuration; pinmuxing
controls switching among silicon blocks that share certain physical
pins, pin configuration handles electron
11 matches
Mail list logo
