Hello,
(cc:ing all ARM related repo custodians for PRs)
I have cleaned up my todo list for 2013.07 and am now preparing for
-rc1.
ARM related repo custodians who have PRs still pending to be
sent to me, please do now.
Any patches that their submitter feels should be in some ARM
repo by now but
The following changes since commit 58bb8f5f6138fa56875574a709f5af98c600c2a9:
cosmetic: arm: fix comments in arch/arm/lib/crt0.S (2013-06-10 21:24:22 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-pxa.git master
for you to fetch changes up to
Hello all,
I have just fast-forwarded u-boot-arm/{master,next} to u-boot/master,
in order to be able to properly pick the zynq commits in the microblaze
mainline/arm branch.
ARM-based tree custodians please make sure you base your PRs onto this
new u-boot-arm/master.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
Hello,
Subject pretty much says it all; ARM custodians / maintainers / devs
can safely assume that any commit from u-boot/master up to 59852d03
that they depend on is already in ARM.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Hello,
I have rebased u-boot-arm/master onto u-boot/master, as of this
writing that's commit 4668a086bb0a769b741e3a4ffab85f1c41c7cdb8
(sandbox: Add asm/errno.h).
This is NOT a pull request: there are still at least one pull request
to come from u-boot-marvell and individual patches.
The pull
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:25:27AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hi all,
after merging the latest ARM pull request, a large number of boards is
broken:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 302
Boards with errors: 6 ( harmony seaboard ventana whistler
Dear Thierry Reding,
In message 20120709061003.ga10...@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de you
wrote:
These have been fixed in tegra/master by the following commit:
commit 329b71b234fd2dcc60a1369d411e4b55a8117df9
Author: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Date: Fri
Hi all,
after merging the latest ARM pull request, a large number of boards is
broken:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 302
Boards with errors: 6 ( harmony seaboard ventana whistler paz00
trimslice )
Boards with warnings but no errors: 49 ( ca9x4_ct_vxp
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
(07/09/2012 07:25 AM), Wolfgang Denk wrote:
cpu.c: In function 'save_boot_params_default':
cpu.c:48:1: warning: -fstack-usage not supported for this target
[enabled by default]
/bin/sh: line 1: exit: too many arguments
make[1]: *** [/work/wd/tmp-arm/dts/dt.dtb] Error 1
On 02/17/2012 02:45 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 14/02/2012 17:45, Rob Herring a écrit :
Albert,
On 02/12/2012 04:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for
which I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
Le 14/02/2012 17:45, Rob Herring a écrit :
Albert,
On 02/12/2012 04:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for
which I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
Boards
Albert,
On 02/12/2012 04:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for
which I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 283
Boards with warnings
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for
which I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 283
Boards with warnings or errors: 61 ( actux1_4_16 actux1_4_32 actux1_8_16
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for
which I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 283
Boards with warnings or errors: 61 ( actux1_4_16 actux1_4_32 actux1_8_16
On 12.02.2012 12:13, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for
which I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 283
Boards with warnings or errors: 61 (
Hi Dirk, Marek, Stefano,
Le 12/02/2012 12:25, Dirk Behme a écrit :
On 12.02.2012 12:13, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for
which I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
hi Albert,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.netwrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which
I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
Boards
hi Albert,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.netwrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which
I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
- SUMMARY
Hi, Sughosh,
Le 12/02/2012 15:03, Sughosh Ganu a écrit :
hi Albert,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.netwrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which
I just sent a pull request.
The raw result is:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi, Sughosh,
Le 12/02/2012 15:03, Sughosh Ganu a écrit :
hi Albert,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.netwrote:
Hi all,
I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the
On 12/02/2012 14:37, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Dirk, Marek, Stefano,
Hi Albert,
Yes. The MX27, MX28, MX31, MX35 and MX5/MX6 fixes for this:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-February/117605.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-February/117528.html
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Tom Rini tom.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
snip
Fail with various causes; I'll send out individual status mails (CC:
interested parties) later today.
I pulled in a new
On 17.09.2011 10:12, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
(board maintainers in CC:)
Hi all,
There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this
point in a ./MAKEALL arm:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 242
Boards with warnings or errors: 13 (
Hi Michael and Stefan,
Le 19/09/2011 20:40, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
Am 09/17/2011 10:12 AM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
(board maintainers in CC:)
Hi all,
There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this
point in a ./MAKEALL arm:
- SUMMARY
Am 09/20/2011 10:44 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Just tried actux3 - I get only this one warning:
/usr/local/pkg/x-tools/armeb-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/.armeb-unknown-linux-gnu-ld:
warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in object.
AFAIK, that one has been there since relocation was added.
I compile
Le 21/09/2011 00:58, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
Am 09/20/2011 10:44 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Just tried actux3 - I get only this one warning:
/usr/local/pkg/x-tools/armeb-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/.armeb-unknown-linux-gnu-ld:
warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in object.
AFAIK, that one has
Hi Albert,
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 22:44:43 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
I do have one of these @work, but rarely take it out of the closet. I
can run tests if required. but I am not sure if it is worth the effort
to keep it.
Since you concur with Stefan, I will drop it.
OTOH, ixdgp425
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 17 September 2011 10:12:02 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
2. ixdp425 is marked orphaned. Stefan, I am wild-guessing that ixdp425
might be acquainted to the ixdpg425 that you maintain. Do you want to
take ixdp425? If not, we should drop it.
I don't have access to it. I vote for
Am 09/17/2011 10:12 AM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
(board maintainers in CC:)
Hi all,
There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this
point in a ./MAKEALL arm:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 242
Boards with warnings or errors:
(board maintainers in CC:)
Hi all,
There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this
point in a ./MAKEALL arm:
- SUMMARY
Boards compiled: 242
Boards with warnings or errors: 13 ( omap3_beagle actux1_4_16
actux1_8_16
Le 30/08/2011 21:08, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4e5d088b.7090...@aribaud.net you wrote:
I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set.
Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which:
- ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with warnings or
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4e5e0c2e.2030...@aribaud.net you wrote:
Got it -- actually, it is not a compiler issue, but a library issue: CS
does compile for big-endian as well as little-endian, but does not
provide big-endian libs
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works,
please try to submit them soon or at lease let me know, and
we've got some Tegra stuff that seems to
Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works,
please try to submit them soon or at lease let me know, and
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
1) if there are any pull requests to
Hi all,
I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set.
Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which:
- ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with warnings or errors ( dnp1110 gcplus lart
shannon ep7312 evb4510 impa7 lpc2292sodimm modnet50 SMN42 jadecpu
smdk2410 VCMA9
Hi Albert,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday, August
Le 30/08/2011 17:57, Simon Glass a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 30/08/2011 17:57, Simon Glass a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27
Le 30/08/2011 18:36, Simon Glass a écrit :
Hi Albert,
I just resent the series as v4 with this change - is that OK?
Apologies -- I had not seen the V4 before posting.
V4 is fine to me and since there was only one comment for V3 and V4's
only change is to address this comment, I think I can
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Le 30/08/2011 18:36, Simon Glass a écrit :
Hi Albert,
I just resent the series as v4 with this change - is that OK?
Apologies -- I had not seen the V4 before posting.
V4 is fine to me and since there was only
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4e5d088b.7090...@aribaud.net you wrote:
I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set.
Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which:
- ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with warnings or errors ( dnp1110 gcplus lart
I think we
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 24/08/2011 20:11, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4e553288.9000...@aribaud.net you wrote:
Wolfgang, did you by any chance use some kind of script to produce your
patchset, and if so, could you regenerate the set of patches for the
remaining boards,
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4e564825.8080...@aribaud.net you wrote:
Well, to the first question the answer is all boards in the patch set
for which an action is still required in patchwork and to the second
That would be:
[U-Boot,46/52] ARM: remove broken at91rm9200dk board
Hi all,
Quick status on the 52-part ARM board removal patch.
After applying various patches and pulling some repositories, the
following boards are still scheduled for removal:
[U-Boot,37/52] ARM: remove broken voiceblue board 2011-07-17
Wolfgang Denk aaribaudNew
[U-Boot,36/52]
Dear Albert,
[snip]
Also, the following boards, for which Reinhard is a delegate, are still
undecided:
[U-Boot,46/52] ARM: remove broken at91rm9200dk board 2011-07-17 Wolfgang
Denk reinhardm New
[U-Boot,45/52] ARM: remove broken m501sk board 2011-07-17 Wolfgang Denk
reinhardm New
Le 24/08/2011 18:09, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
Dear Albert,
[snip]
Also, the following boards, for which Reinhard is a delegate, are
still undecided:
[U-Boot,46/52] ARM: remove broken at91rm9200dk board 2011-07-17
Wolfgang Denk reinhardm New
[U-Boot,45/52] ARM: remove broken m501sk board
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4e553288.9000...@aribaud.net you wrote:
Wolfgang, did you by any chance use some kind of script to produce your
patchset, and if so, could you regenerate the set of patches for the
remaining boards, those that currently have an 'action required' status
in
Hi Albert,
On 08/22/2011 10:15 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
Hi Albert,
On 08/20/2011 01:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
snip
Sandeep has requested that I pick these two in u-boot-arm.
snip
So is right that everything else in the responsibility of Sandeep won't
make it into the next
Hi Albert,
On 08/20/2011 01:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
snip
Sandeep has requested that I pick these two in u-boot-arm.
snip
So is right that everything else in the responsibility of Sandeep won't
make it into the next release?
How about the next tree?
Regards
Simon
Hi Albert,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Dirk,
Le 21/08/2011 09:11, Dirk Behme a écrit :
But, hmm,
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=summary
doesn't show the applied patches yet? Did I miss something?
You did not; I did
On 20.08.2011 17:32, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62, and has been applied.
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
This one kind of half-fixes
Hi Dirk,
Le 21/08/2011 09:11, Dirk Behme a écrit :
But, hmm,
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=summary
doesn't show the applied patches yet? Did I miss something?
You did not; I did -- forgot to push master. Fixed now, thanks for
pointing this out.
Best regards
Dirk
On 20.08.2011 17:32, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
...
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
This one kind of half-fixes the two boards it touches: they now build
but with warnings, all the same, of which here is one:
clocks.c:274:
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi all,
Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62, and has been applied.
2.
Hi Dirk,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 20.08.2011 17:32, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
...
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
This one kind of half-fixes the two boards it touches:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 21/08/2011 09:51, V, Aneesh a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi all,
Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
This one lowers bad board builds from 69
Hi Albert,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 21/08/2011 09:51, V, Aneesh a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi all,
Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a
Hi Aneesh,
Le 21/08/2011 10:56, V, Aneesh a écrit :
This indeed fixes it. Strange that the warning is not emitted by your
toolchain.
Yes, that's indeed strange. Even with your tool-chain it should've emitted
more warnings. Many of those unsigned variables were assigned -1 in
elsewhere.
On 19.08.2011 00:09, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current
u-boot-arm/master tree. So:
1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works,
Aneesh, Dirk,
Le 19/08/2011 20:19, Dirk Behme a écrit :
On 19.08.2011 11:38, Aneesh V wrote:
Hi Albert,
On Friday 19 August 2011 03:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it that still fail to
On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current
u-boot-arm/master tree. So:
1) if there are any pull requests to
Hi Marek,
Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current
u-boot-arm/master tree. So:
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 01:44:23 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Marek,
Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it
Hi Marek,
Le 20/08/2011 14:24, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 01:44:23 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Marek,
Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 02:54:02 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Marek,
Le 20/08/2011 14:24, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 01:44:23 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Marek,
Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit :
On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert
Hi all,
Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/
This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62, and has been applied.
2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/
This one kind of half-fixes the two boards it touches: they now build
but
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works,
please try to submit them soon or at lease let me know, and
we've got some Tegra stuff that seems to be waiting for merging (or at least
feedback as to anything left
Hi Albert,
On Friday 19 August 2011 03:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current
u-boot-arm/master tree. So:
1) if there are any pull requests to
On 19.08.2011 11:38, Aneesh V wrote:
Hi Albert,
On Friday 19 August 2011 03:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current
u-boot-arm/master tree. So:
1) if
Hi all,
This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and
apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current
u-boot-arm/master tree. So:
1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works,
please try to submit them soon or at lease let me
Hello,
unfortunately I made a mess in the ARM repository last night; the
commits that were supposed to be applied to the master branch were
actually applied to the elf_reloc branch.
I fixed this now - no damage was done to master, but I had to rebase
the elf_reloc branch.
Sorry for the
72 matches
Mail list logo
