Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090613145439.gg25...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
i dont get it. the CPP expands into if(0) and unless you have a completely
shitty compiler, gcc will do dead code elimination on it resulting in the
same
binary size.
I've seen to
On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
Applied to net repo.
Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
I saw you moving things out of cpu/* a while back.
- Dave
___
U-Boot
David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
Applied to net repo.
Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
I saw you moving things out of cpu/* a while back.
- Dave
Good
On 00:01 Fri 19 Jun , Ben Warren wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
Applied to net repo.
Thanks. Random question: is that driver going to move
into drivers/net or will it stay in cpu/arm920t? I thought
I saw you moving things
David,
David Brownell wrote:
CSB337 boards originally shipped with MicroMonitor, not U-Boot;
and with a version using a different convention for recording
Ethernet addresses than anyone else. To avoid breaking Linux
when it uses U-Boot, have it use the same convention on that
hardware.
On 15:02 Fri 12 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 11:14 Tue 09 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
I'm not really a fan of this
but ok if I see the csn337 board patch
I meant to send that in before, thanks for the reminder.
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
The machine_is_X() macros are automatically #ifdeffed in
the header; no size impact. Read asm/mach-types.h ...
If I use this pacth on the rm9200ek the u-boot.bin size will increase
for nothing
I'm not following you. The
On 04:13 Sat 13 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
The machine_is_X() macros are automatically #ifdeffed in
the header; no size impact. Read asm/mach-types.h ...
If I use this pacth on the rm9200ek the u-boot.bin size
On 10:50 Sat 13 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 08:28:23 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 04:13 Sat 13 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
The machine_is_X() macros are automatically
On Saturday 13 June 2009 10:54:39 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 10:50 Sat 13 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 08:28:23 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 04:13 Sat 13 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Jean-Christophe
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
See above. There already *IS* such an #ifdef, but it's just not
cluttering up the guts of that driver.
you adding MUST have NO size impact on other board
if we apply you code as it we will increase the size of u-boot for
On 11:14 Tue 09 Jun , David Brownell wrote:
CSB337 boards originally shipped with MicroMonitor, not U-Boot;
and with a version using a different convention for recording
Ethernet addresses than anyone else. To avoid breaking Linux
when it uses U-Boot, have it use the same convention on
12 matches
Mail list logo
