Re: [U-Boot] [patch 2/2] Add support for building the new U-boot uImage format (FIT-format)

Hello Wolfgang, If an older mkimage is detected, or if there is no dtc (Device Tree Compiler) Why should there ever be no dtc? It is part of the Linux kernel source tree, see arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src uuh, because it was not there in 2.6.24...? And that was the kernel I made the patch for

[U-Boot] [patch 2/2] Add support for building the new U-boot uImage format (FIT-format)

Allow building of the newer FIT-image format for U-boot, while keeping it possible to build the legacy format, for people who do not want to (or can) upgrade to U-boot 1.3.3 or newer. If an older mkimage is detected, or if there is no dtc (Device Tree Compiler) then automagically the legacy

Re: [U-Boot] [patch 2/2] Add support for building the new U-boot uImage format (FIT-format)

Dear Remy, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Allow building of the newer FIT-image format for U-boot, while keeping it possible to build the legacy format, for people who do not want to (or can) upgrade to U-boot 1.3.3 or newer. If an older mkimage is detected, or if there is no