[...]
> > >
> > > My current patch-set is also to cleaning up the driver waiting for
> > > splitting them someday on the other hand. After you check
> > > CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC in u-boot source, if you think it's better we
> > > should split them right now, I could work on the driver splitting.
> >
> >
Hi Lukasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukasz Majewski
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 2:39 PM
> To: Y.b. Lu
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [v2, 1/3] mmc: fsl_esdhc: add esdhc_imx flag
>
> Hi "Y.b. Lu",
>
> >
Hi "Y.b. Lu",
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lukasz Majewski
> > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 7:12 AM
> > To: Y.b. Lu
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [v2, 1/3] mmc:
Hi Lukasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukasz Majewski
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 7:12 AM
> To: Y.b. Lu
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [v2, 1/3] mmc: fsl_esdhc: add esdhc_imx flag
>
> Dear "Y.b. Lu",
>
> > T
Dear "Y.b. Lu",
> The fsl_esdhc driver was for Freescale eSDHC on MPC83XX/MPC85XX
> initially. The later QoriQ series processors (which were evolutions
> of MPC83XX/MPC85XX) and i.MX series processors were using this
> driver for their eSDHCs too.
>
> So there are two evolution directions for
> -Original Message-
> From: Y.b. Lu
> Sent: 2019年2月15日 10:26
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung ; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> ; Peng Fan ; Y.b. Lu
>
> Subject: [v2, 1/3] mmc: fsl_esdhc: add esdhc_imx flag
>
> The fsl_esdhc driver was for Freescale eSDHC on MPC83XX/MPC85XX
The fsl_esdhc driver was for Freescale eSDHC on MPC83XX/MPC85XX
initially. The later QoriQ series processors (which were evolutions
of MPC83XX/MPC85XX) and i.MX series processors were using this
driver for their eSDHCs too.
So there are two evolution directions for eSDHC now. For the two
series
7 matches
Mail list logo
