On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:59:14 +0800
Jason Liu liu.h.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/21 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:43:55 +0800
Lei Wen adrian.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:43:55 +0800
Lei Wen adrian.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:05:05PM +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
Rebased version for this nand chip has one problem in detecting its
page size using in
2010/7/21 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:43:55 +0800
Lei Wen adrian.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:05:05PM +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
Rebased version for this nand chip has
The Samsung K9LBG08UXD parts are 32Gbytes x 8 bits 3.3V parts with
the 0xD7 identifier. Add this to the list of known devices IDs.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Rebased version for this nand chip has one problem in detecting its
page size using in nand_base.c.
If we set page size 0 in nand_ids.c, we would get the calculation
result as page size 2048, while the true page size is 4096.
I think it is reasonable to set the 32Gigabit nand as 4k page by
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:05:05PM +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
Rebased version for this nand chip has one problem in detecting its
page size using in nand_base.c.
If we set page size 0 in nand_ids.c, we would get the calculation
result as page size 2048, while the true page size is 4096.
Is the ID
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:05:05PM +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
Rebased version for this nand chip has one problem in detecting its
page size using in nand_base.c.
If we set page size 0 in nand_ids.c, we would get the
7 matches
Mail list logo
