Hi,
On 09/11/17 15:23, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/11/17 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:29:21AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to increase
Hi Andre,
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/17 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:29:21AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
>>> able
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 06:11:58PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 09/11/17 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:29:21AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to
Hi,
On 09/11/17 12:41, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/11/17 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:29:21AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to increase SPL size to
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/17 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:29:21AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
>>> able to fit new
Hi,
On 09/11/17 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:29:21AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
>> able to fit new features like falcon. I knew the limit about 32K but
>> page[1] stating that we can use
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:29:21AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
> able to fit new features like falcon. I knew the limit about 32K but
> page[1] stating that we can use approximately 192 KiB of contiguous
> SRAM.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 11:53:48AM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >>> because I've tried with 64K SPL size with existing SPL code and was
> >>> able to boot, but with increasing SPL by enabling falcon seems like
> >>> BROM unable read eGON.BT0 which eventually booting failed. Any inputs?
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/17 11:38, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:36 AM, André Przywara
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/11/17 19:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying
Hi,
On 09/11/17 11:38, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:36 AM, André Przywara wrote:
>> On 08/11/17 19:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
>>> able to fit new features like
Hi Andre,
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:36 AM, André Przywara wrote:
> On 08/11/17 19:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
>> able to fit new features like falcon. I knew the limit about 32K but
>> page[1]
On 08/11/17 19:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
> able to fit new features like falcon. I knew the limit about 32K but
> page[1] stating that we can use approximately 192 KiB of contiguous
> SRAM.
We are not really sure about
Hi,
I'm trying to increase SPL size to 64K(with SRAM A2), so-that SPL can
able to fit new features like falcon. I knew the limit about 32K but
page[1] stating that we can use approximately 192 KiB of contiguous
SRAM.
eGON.BT0 has limit of reading 32KB, Can't we use > 32KB SPL here?
because I've
13 matches
Mail list logo