On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 09:44 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> IIRC, Tegra support in U-Boot was added in the days before DT was a
> thing, or a widespread thing at least. (Oh, happy days!) I imagine
> that
> the config option was simply never removed since there was no
> specific
> need to do so.
Hi everyone,
Thanks for explanation!
Keeping ATAGS makes sense for combination of new U-Boot and old Linux.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi,
On 17-12-15 10:21, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 07:40 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:59:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
2015-12-17 13:58 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :
Hi,
I noticed some well-maintained new SoC
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 07:40 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:59:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > 2015-12-17 13:58 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada > om>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed some well-maintained new SoC families still
> > > define
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17-12-15 10:21, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 07:40 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:59:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>>2015-12-17 13:58 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada
On 12/16/2015 09:59 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
+ To: U-Boot ML
I forgot to send this to ML.
2015-12-17 13:58 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :
Hi,
I noticed some well-maintained new SoC families still
define CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG.
For example,
+ To: U-Boot ML
I forgot to send this to ML.
2015-12-17 13:58 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :
> Hi,
>
> I noticed some well-maintained new SoC families still
> define CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG.
>
>
> For example,
>
> include/configs/tegra-common.h
>
> #define
7 matches
Mail list logo