Hi Giulio,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 7:50 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
> With this you mean adding every single mux, divider, gate, fixed_factor
> and pfd(i.e. linux/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxq6.c)?
>
> Or only a shrinked version of that?
> I mean, is it ok if I list everything during imxrt_clk_probe()?
Hi Fabio,
On 10/9/19 6:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Giulio,
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:59 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
Hi Fabio and Stefano,
On 9/29/19 9:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
We try to use DM in U-Boot proper as much as possible, but using DM in
SPL is currently not a requirement,
On 10/10/19 8:29 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Giulio,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:30 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
Hi Fabio and Stefano,
about imxrt porting, would it make sense to add an SDRAM driver to setup
ram or is it enough to provide .cfg file with DCD?
Having the DDR initialization
Hi Giulio,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:30 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio and Stefano,
>
> about imxrt porting, would it make sense to add an SDRAM driver to setup
> ram or is it enough to provide .cfg file with DCD?
Having the DDR initialization running in C code from internal RAM is
more
Hi Fabio and Stefano,
about imxrt porting, would it make sense to add an SDRAM driver to setup
ram or is it enough to provide .cfg file with DCD?
This question is specific for SDRAM of course.
Thanks in advance
Best regards
--
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas
Hi Giulio,
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:59 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio and Stefano,
>
> On 9/29/19 9:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > We try to use DM in U-Boot proper as much as possible, but using DM in
> > SPL is currently not a requirement, especially due to internal RAM
> > size
Hi Fabio and Stefano,
On 9/29/19 9:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
We try to use DM in U-Boot proper as much as possible, but using DM in
SPL is currently not a requirement, especially due to internal RAM
size constraints.
IOMUXC and LPUART(using 24Mhz clock) work correctly using DM.
About clk
Hi Giulio,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:57 AM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
> While porting IMXRT I'm realizing that things would fit better if adding
> to mach-imx folder. This is because IMXRT has a lot in common with imx
> on low level side, i.e. iomux, clock. So I would go for mach-imx instead
> of
Hi Stefano and Fabio,
On 9/11/19 8:50 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Giulio,
On 10/09/19 20:32, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hello everybody,
I would like to port imxrt to u-boot and I would like to ask you:
- do you have the interest on upstreaming it?
if yes:
I've seen how they've dealt with 'stm32'
Hi Stefano,
On 9/11/19 8:50 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Giulio,
On 10/09/19 20:32, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hello everybody,
I would like to port imxrt to u-boot and I would like to ask you:
- do you have the interest on upstreaming it?
if yes:
I've seen how they've dealt with 'stm32' and
Hi Fabio,
On 9/11/19 12:23 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Giulio,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 3:32 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
Hello everybody,
I would like to port imxrt to u-boot and I would like to ask you:
- do you have the interest on upstreaming it?
if yes:
I've seen how they've dealt with
Hello everybody,
I would like to port imxrt to u-boot and I would like to ask you:
- do you have the interest on upstreaming it?
if yes:
I've seen how they've dealt with 'stm32' and 'stm32mp' that is similar
to 'imxrt' and 'imx'. So should follow the same criterias for porting? I
mean adding
Hi Giulio,
On 10/09/19 20:32, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to port imxrt to u-boot and I would like to ask you:
> - do you have the interest on upstreaming it?
> if yes:
> I've seen how they've dealt with 'stm32' and 'stm32mp' that is similar
> to 'imxrt' and 'imx'.
Hi Giulio,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 3:32 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to port imxrt to u-boot and I would like to ask you:
> - do you have the interest on upstreaming it?
> if yes:
> I've seen how they've dealt with 'stm32' and 'stm32mp' that is similar
> to
14 matches
Mail list logo
