On 10/19/2015 02:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a patch series that I need to test across several
> architectures (Need to build all the boards that select
> CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO).
>
> I started trying to accomplish this task with buildman and it failed
> to build.
On 10/19/2015 02:27 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:21 PM, York Sun wrote:
>> On 10/19/2015 02:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am working on a patch series that I need to test across several
>>> architectures (Need to build all the
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:21 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 02:17 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am working on a patch series that I need to test across several
>> architectures (Need to build all the boards that select
>> CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO).
>>
>> I
Hi,
I am working on a patch series that I need to test across several
architectures (Need to build all the boards that select
CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO).
I started trying to accomplish this task with buildman and it failed
to build. After that I tried building it manually.
I am getting the
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:17:51PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a patch series that I need to test across several
> architectures (Need to build all the boards that select
> CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO).
>
> I started trying to accomplish this task with buildman and it
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Something is very whacky. From my ~/.buildman:
>
> [toolchain]
> m68k: /opt/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/m68k-linux
Interesting. For m68k I am using this same toolchain:
export ARCH=m68k
export
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:49:33PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Something is very whacky. From my ~/.buildman:
> >
> > [toolchain]
> > m68k: /opt/gcc-4.9.0-nolibc/m68k-linux
>
> Interesting. For m68k I am using this
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> Yes, you are right.
>>
>> I had to use the brute force approach and git clone the tree again.
>>
>> Now I can build for different archs.
>
> 'git clean -dfx' should also do it, btw.
Great, thanks for this hint.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> I bet you have a dirty tree. I never do in-tree builds and only do out
> of tree builds and I've heard earlier today that there's some problems
> with dirty in-tree builds.
Yes, you are right.
I had to use the brute force
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:36:45PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > I bet you have a dirty tree. I never do in-tree builds and only do out
> > of tree builds and I've heard earlier today that there's some problems
> > with
10 matches
Mail list logo