Michael Zaidman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Michael Zaidman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If nobody has objections I can submit this fix.
>>>
>>> Michael.
>>>
>> Please do.
>>
>> regards,
>> Ben
>>
>>
>
> Done.
>
> http:/
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Michael Zaidman
> wrote:
>>
>> If nobody has objections I can submit this fix.
>>
>> Michael.
>
> Please do.
>
> regards,
> Ben
>
Done.
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056354.html
Regards,
Mi
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Michael Zaidman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Robin Getz
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 13 Jul 2009 11:11, Michael Zaidman pondered:
> > > > I did verify that reverting the line exposes the bug that Michael
> fixed, ...
> > >
> > > Ok, my target uses static I
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Robin Getz wrote:
>
> On Mon 13 Jul 2009 11:11, Michael Zaidman pondered:
> > > I did verify that reverting the line exposes the bug that Michael fixed,
> > > ...
> >
> > Ok, my target uses static IP configuration so I did not verified the DHCP
> > behavior. Now I
On Mon 13 Jul 2009 11:11, Michael Zaidman pondered:
> > I did verify that reverting the line exposes the bug that Michael fixed, ...
>
> Ok, my target uses static IP configuration so I did not verified the DHCP
> behavior. Now I did it. I also reverted the line and did DHCP afterwards
> changed th
On Mon 13 Jul 2009 11:11, Michael Zaidman pondered:
> > I did verify that reverting the line exposes the bug that Michael fixed, ...
>
> Ok, my target uses static IP configuration so I did not verified the DHCP
> behavior. Now I did it. I also reverted the line and did DHCP afterwards
> changed th
> I did verify that reverting the line exposes the bug that Michael fixed, ...
Ok, my target uses static IP configuration so I did not verified the DHCP
behavior. Now I did it. I also reverted the line and did DHCP afterwards
changed the subnet and did DHCP again. It works as expected.
diff --git
On Sun 12 Jul 2009 09:14, Michael Zaidman pondered:
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Robin Getz
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri 10 Jul 2009 12:27, Robin Getz pondered:
> > >
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-net.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c172c4fdbbb5858fae38478d6399be4a16be3fc
> >
> > causes a regressio
Dear Michael Zaidman,
In message <660c0f820907120614i2b33d8a1g9ac46c103e548...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> Did you try to remove the CONFIG_IPADDR from the board's config file?
> In this case the NetOurIP will get 0. That should solve the problem.
Setting or not setting CONFIG_IPADDR
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Fri 10 Jul 2009 12:27, Robin Getz pondered:
> > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-net.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c172c4fdbbb5
> > 858fae38478d6399be4a16be3fc
> >
> > causes a regression on my network's DHCP server.
> > The part of the diff that c
On Fri 10 Jul 2009 12:27, Robin Getz pondered:
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-net.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c172c4fdbbb5
> 858fae38478d6399be4a16be3fc
>
> causes a regression on my network's DHCP server.
>
> The part of the diff that causes the problem:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_CMD_DHCP)
>
>
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-net.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c172c4fdbbb5858fae38478d6399be4a16be3fc
causes a regression on my network's DHCP server.
The part of the diff that causes the problem:
#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_DHCP)
case DHCP:
- /* Start with a cle
12 matches
Mail list logo
