Hi Fabio,
On Thursday 15 July 2010 11:55:17 Fabio Giovagnini wrote:
In my experience the SST39VF6402B has become full compliant with CFI mtd
interface just few linux kernel ago. In linux 2.6.17 it was not.
I'm developing on
U-Boot 2010.06-rc2-07985-g53f7677-dirty (lug 15 2010 - 11:41:21)
I Stefan. I did teh following upgrade of the fileyou suggestied to me.
#define SST39VF6402B0x236c
...
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_LEGACY_4Mx16
{
.mfr_id = (u16)SST_MANUFACT,
.dev_id = SST39VF6402B,
.name = SST
On Monday 19 July 2010 11:04:34 Fabio Giovagnini wrote:
I Stefan. I did teh following upgrade of the fileyou suggestied to me.
#define SST39VF6402B 0x236c
...
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_LEGACY_4Mx16
{
.mfr_id = (u16)SST_MANUFACT,
.dev_id =
Hi Fabio,
(please keep the list on Cc).
On Monday 19 July 2010 11:27:50 Fabio Giovagnini wrote:
I do not think so about teh different regons.
I attach the datasheet I found on the net and I cannot find anythink about
two different regions for
SST39VF6402B
Maybe I'm wrong.
Yes, you are
I supposed the list doesn't like the attachment.
Anyway I understand, now.
I'll make you know how I'll solve.
Thanks a lot and best regards
In data lunedì 19 luglio 2010 11:33:43, Stefan Roese ha scritto:
: Hi Fabio,
(please keep the list on Cc).
On Monday 19 July 2010 11:27:50 Fabio
This is the rigth config for such a FLASH chip
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_LEGACY_4Mx16
{
.mfr_id = (u16)SST_MANUFACT,
.dev_id = SST39VF6402B,
.name = SST 39VF6402B,
.uaddr = {
On Monday 19 July 2010 15:57:09 Fabio Giovagnini wrote:
This is the rigth config for such a FLASH chip
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_LEGACY_4Mx16
{
.mfr_id = (u16)SST_MANUFACT,
.dev_id = SST39VF6402B,
.name = SST
Ok
Cheers
In data lunedì 19 luglio 2010 16:19:23, Stefan Roese ha scritto:
: On Monday 19 July 2010 15:57:09 Fabio Giovagnini wrote:
This is the rigth config for such a FLASH chip
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_LEGACY_4Mx16
{
.mfr_id = (u16)SST_MANUFACT,
Hi all,
In my experience the SST39VF6402B has become full compliant with CFI mtd
interface just few linux kernel ago. In linux 2.6.17 it was not.
I'm developing on
U-Boot 2010.06-rc2-07985-g53f7677-dirty (lug 15 2010 - 11:41:21)
is it compliant with SST39VF6402B
Is among of you other people
9 matches
Mail list logo
