Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:16:43PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Hi.

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:22:35PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On 8 August 2014 07:04, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This is quite a slow process

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-11 Thread Simon Glass
+Masahiro Hi Tom, On 11 August 2014 07:37, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:16:43PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Tom, On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 1 August 2014

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-10 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Hi. On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-10 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Hi. On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-10 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On 8 August 2014 07:04, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully processed. What can we do to

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-08 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Masahiro, On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Hi. On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This is quite a slow process since each board config must

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Hi. On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-08 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully processed. What can we do to improve this? We only need a small number of options in order

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-07 Thread York Sun
On 08/04/2014 06:22 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: Hi York, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700 York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote: On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments (which means build all the board), boards.cfg is not

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-07 Thread Jeroen Hofstee
Hello York, On 07-08-14 22:52, York Sun wrote: On 08/04/2014 06:22 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: Hi York, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700 York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote: On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments (which means

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-07 Thread York Sun
On 08/07/2014 01:57 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: I can't parse the python either, but is this not the same issue? (just from the looks of it) https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/377897/ It is the same solution/workaround, but I'm not sure if Roger has the same issue. York

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-04 Thread York Sun
On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments (which means build all the board), boards.cfg is not necessary in the first place. It that case, can we skip generating boards.cfg ? (We can get the board list by 'ls configs' ) We

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-04 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 1 August 2014 12:31, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: Dear Masahiro, In message 20140801225339.d541.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com you wrote: It that case, can we skip generating boards.cfg ? (We can get the board list by 'ls configs' ) This would neither give all build target names

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-04 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi York, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700 York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote: On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments (which means build all the board), boards.cfg is not necessary in the first place. It that case,

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-04 Thread York Sun
Mailing List u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg Hi York, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700 York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote: On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments (which means build

[U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully processed. What can we do to improve this? We only need a small number of options in order to start buildman - things like CONFIG_SYS_ARCH, CONFIG_SYS_CPU, etc.

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-01 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi. On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully processed. What can we do to improve this? We only need a small number of

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:22:42PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: Hi. On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-01 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Simon, Tom, On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:38:03 -0400 Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:22:42PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: Hi. On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi, At present, as a work-around, we generate

Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg

2014-08-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Masahiro, In message 20140801225339.d541.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com you wrote: It that case, can we skip generating boards.cfg ? (We can get the board list by 'ls configs' ) This would neither give all build target names no=r do the needed translation of names (like upper case - lower