On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:16:43PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:22:35PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 8 August 2014 07:04, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This
is quite a slow process
+Masahiro
Hi Tom,
On 11 August 2014 07:37, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:16:43PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 1 August 2014
Hi Tom,
On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
Hi Tom,
On 8 August 2014 05:59, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
Hi Tom,
On 8 August 2014 07:04, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This
is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully
processed.
What can we do to
Hi Masahiro,
On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This
is quite a slow process since each board config must
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:06:03AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Masahiro,
On 1 August 2014 06:22, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This
is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully
processed.
What can we do to improve this? We only need a small number of options
in order
On 08/04/2014 06:22 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi York,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700
York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments
(which means build all the board),
boards.cfg is not
Hello York,
On 07-08-14 22:52, York Sun wrote:
On 08/04/2014 06:22 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi York,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700
York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments
(which means
On 08/07/2014 01:57 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
I can't parse the python either, but is this not the same issue?
(just from the looks of it) https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/377897/
It is the same solution/workaround, but I'm not sure if Roger has the same
issue.
York
On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments
(which means build all the board),
boards.cfg is not necessary in the first place.
It that case, can we skip generating boards.cfg ?
(We can get the board list by 'ls configs' )
We
Hi,
On 1 August 2014 12:31, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Masahiro,
In message 20140801225339.d541.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com you wrote:
It that case, can we skip generating boards.cfg ?
(We can get the board list by 'ls configs' )
This would neither give all build target names
Hi York,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700
York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments
(which means build all the board),
boards.cfg is not necessary in the first place.
It that case,
Mailing
List u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Removing the need for boards.cfg
Hi York,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:58:56 -0700
York Sun york...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/01/2014 06:53 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
If MAKEALL/buildman is invoked without any arguments
(which means build
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This
is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully
processed.
What can we do to improve this? We only need a small number of options
in order to start buildman - things like CONFIG_SYS_ARCH,
CONFIG_SYS_CPU, etc.
Hi.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This
is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully
processed.
What can we do to improve this? We only need a small number of
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:22:42PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate boards.cfg if needed. This
is quite a slow process since each board config must be fully
Simon, Tom,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:38:03 -0400
Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:22:42PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:48:44 +0100
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
At present, as a work-around, we generate
Dear Masahiro,
In message 20140801225339.d541.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com you wrote:
It that case, can we skip generating boards.cfg ?
(We can get the board list by 'ls configs' )
This would neither give all build target names no=r do the needed
translation of names (like upper case - lower
21 matches
Mail list logo