Re: [U-Boot] SoC specific driver changes through other custodian's trees?

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message 4d624a5e.30...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote: Please, provide a separate patch for changes in the OHCI drivers. They need to go to the u-boot-usb tree. Apart from the fact that no change is required here.. I don't think it would make sense to let ATMEL

Re: [U-Boot] SoC specific driver changes through other custodian's trees?

2011-02-21 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message4d624a5e.30...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote: Please, provide a separate patch for changes in the OHCI drivers. They need to go to the u-boot-usb tree. Apart from the fact that no change is required here.. I don't think it would make

Re: [U-Boot] SoC specific driver changes through other custodian's trees?

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message 4d626a18.7030...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote: I'm not sure what that means, but the rework effort won't work when not all required changes are in one tree. And how would, for example, the NET custodian verify a patch when it would not even build when the