.
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 7:03 AM
>> >> To: York Sun
>> >> Cc: Simon Glass ; Prabhakar Kushwaha
>> >> ; u-boot@l
Hi Bin,
> -Original Message-
> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Bin Meng
> Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 8:11 PM
> To: Prabhakar Kushwaha
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Support of device-tree for PowerPC platform: Query
;> Cc: Simon Glass ; Prabhakar Kushwaha
>> ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Support of device-tree for PowerPC platform: Query
>>
>> Hi York,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
>> > On 06/27/2018 10:53 PM, Bin Meng wr
Dear Bin,
Coming back to x86 example.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 7:03 AM
> To: York Sun
> Cc: Simon Glass ; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Support of de
Dear Bin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 9:09 AM
> To: Prabhakar Kushwaha
> Cc: York Sun ; Simon Glass ; u-
> b...@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Support of device-tree for PowerPC platform: Qu
Hi Prabhakar,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha
wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: York Sun
>> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 9:07 PM
>> To: Prabhakar Kushwaha ; Simon Glass
>>
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Poonam Aggrwal ;
>> Jagdish Gediya
>> Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: York Sun
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 9:07 PM
> To: Prabhakar Kushwaha ; Simon Glass
>
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Poonam Aggrwal ;
> Jagdish Gediya
> Subject: Re: Support of device-tree for PowerPC platform: Query
>
> On 06/27/2018 11:30 PM, Prabhakar
Hi York,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:32 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On 06/27/2018 10:53 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>
>>
>>> Can the DT perhaps go before U-Boot in the flash? We would need a way
>>> to find it though.
>>>
>>
>> I don't see any issue that DT go after U-Boot in the flash. x86 does
>> this way,
On 06/27/2018 11:30 PM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
>> Thanks for the direction.
>>
>> We will be following approach "a" with updated flash map.
>> We will allocate 1MB for uboot in flash. Out which 64K for DTB and 960KB for
>> u-boot for future increase.
>>
>> We will also update location of env
On 06/27/2018 10:53 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>
>> Can the DT perhaps go before U-Boot in the flash? We would need a way
>> to find it though.
>>
>
> I don't see any issue that DT go after U-Boot in the flash. x86 does
> this way, and its reset vector is also the last address of flash.
>
Big issue.
Hi Simon,
> -Original Message-
> From: Prabhakar Kushwaha
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:17 AM
> To: Simon Glass ; York Sun
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Poonam Aggrwal ;
> Jagdish Gediya
> Subject: RE: Support of device-tree for PowerPC platform: Query
>
> Hi Simon,
>
>
> >
Hi Prabhakar,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:05 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27 June 2018 at 08:06, York Sun wrote:
>>
>> +Simon
>>
>> On 06/27/2018 01:05 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > We are trying to add support of device-tree for PowerPC platforms. As per
>> > our
Hi Simon,
> -Original Message-
> From: s...@google.com [mailto:s...@google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 3:36 AM
> To: York Sun
> Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha ; u-
> b...@lists.denx.de; Poonam Aggrwal ; Jagdish
> Gediya
> Subject: Re: Support of device-tree
Hi,
On 27 June 2018 at 08:06, York Sun wrote:
>
> +Simon
>
> On 06/27/2018 01:05 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are trying to add support of device-tree for PowerPC platforms. As per
> > our analysis following 2 options can be used.
> >
> > a) CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE
> > b)
+Simon
On 06/27/2018 01:05 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are trying to add support of device-tree for PowerPC platforms. As per our
> analysis following 2 options can be used.
>
> a) CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE
> b) CONFIG_OF_EMBED
>
> In PowerPC platforms, reset_vector is always
Hi All,
We are trying to add support of device-tree for PowerPC platforms. As per our
analysis following 2 options can be used.
a) CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE
b) CONFIG_OF_EMBED
In PowerPC platforms, reset_vector is always expected at the **last** address
of flash.
U-boot binary has reset_vector
16 matches
Mail list logo
