Dear Derek Ou,
In message 497dfe89.7020...@siconix.com you wrote:
The following patch was tested some time ago. I am in the middle of
another task and can not
verify this patch with the latest code. Should I just reformat my patch
and submit it or should I
wait till I can test it with
Hi, Wolfgang,
The following patch was tested some time ago. I am in the middle of
another task and can not
verify this patch with the latest code. Should I just reformat my patch
and submit it or should I
wait till I can test it with the latest code?
Also, I found that jffs2 scanning routine
Dear Derek Ou,
In message 49515bd6.9030...@siconix.com you wrote:
The ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ### error and the zero NAND
sector size problem can be fixed by the following patch. However, the
jffs2 scanning routine does not skip the bad blocks in NAND though.
Derek
Hi, all,
When I tested jffs2 command for NAND, I found that jffs2_1pass.c::
jffs2_1pass_build_lists() fails at
u32 nr_sectors = part-size/part-sector_size;
because part-sector_size is zero. And cause the ### ERROR ### Please
RESET the board ### error when entering the for loop (i
4 matches
Mail list logo