> On 17.03.2019, at 15:12, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Well, my thinking is that GD is actually a set of pointers, with the
> actual data stored elsewhere. The nice thing about bloblist is that it
> is a contiguous block of a set size, which holds data used by
> different parts of U-Boot (e.g.
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 at 20:01, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> > > First, we have GD, which exists since the dawn of U-Boot, which was
> > > intended to pass data between boot stages (by then, before and after
> > > relocation), but
Dear Simon,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > First, we have GD, which exists since the dawn of U-Boot, which was
> > intended to pass data between boot stages (by then, before and after
> > relocation), but apparently it has never been used for passing
> > information between SPL and U-Boot proper.
Hi Wolfgang,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 02:34, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> Dear Simon,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> > I think it is a reasonable idea to allow the gd region to pass from
> > TPL -> SPL -> U-Boot. But we'll need to remove use of
> > CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(), or put shared things at
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 05:41:36AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Am 13.03.2019 um 19:19 schrieb Tom Rini:
> >On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:18:06AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>Hello Stefano,
> >>
> >>Am 13.03.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefano Babic:
> >>>Hi Heiko,
> >>>
> >>>On
Dear Simon,
In message
you wrote:
>
> I think it is a reasonable idea to allow the gd region to pass from
> TPL -> SPL -> U-Boot. But we'll need to remove use of
> CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(), or put shared things at the beginning of the
> structure.
Indeed. And/or split things up in "common" stuff
Hello Simon,
Am 14.03.2019 um 11:02 schrieb Simon Glass:
Hi Heiko,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 02:50, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Simon, Tom,
Am 12.03.2019 um 09:21 schrieb Heiko Schocher:
Hello Simon, Tom,
I am just stumbeld on an am437x basd board over the problem to pass
the bootmode from
Hello Tom,
Am 13.03.2019 um 19:19 schrieb Tom Rini:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:18:06AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Stefano,
Am 13.03.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefano Babic:
Hi Heiko,
On 13/03/19 08:44, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 12.03.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Hi Heiko,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 02:50, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
> Hello Simon, Tom,
>
> Am 12.03.2019 um 09:21 schrieb Heiko Schocher:
> > Hello Simon, Tom,
> >
> > I am just stumbeld on an am437x basd board over the problem to pass
> > the bootmode from SPL to U-Boot. On am437x the bootmode
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:18:06AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Stefano,
>
> Am 13.03.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefano Babic:
> >Hi Heiko,
> >
> >On 13/03/19 08:44, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>Hello Wolfgang,
> >>
> >>Am 12.03.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> >>>Dear Tom,
> >>>
> >>>In
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:44:45AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> Am 12.03.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> >Dear Tom,
> >
> >In message <20190312173125.GP4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >>
> >>>I think you were misled by Heiko's description. What he really ment
>
Hello Stefano,
Am 13.03.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefano Babic:
Hi Heiko,
On 13/03/19 08:44, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 12.03.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Tom,
In message <20190312173125.GP4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
I think you were misled by Heiko's
Hi Heiko,
On 13/03/19 08:44, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> Am 12.03.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> In message <20190312173125.GP4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>>
I think you were misled by Heiko's description. What he really ment
was just that
Hello Wolfgang,
Am 12.03.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Tom,
In message <20190312173125.GP4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
I think you were misled by Heiko's description. What he really ment
was just that the addresses where the boot ROM stored the
information about the boot device
Dear Tom,
In message <20190312173125.GP4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > I think you were misled by Heiko's description. What he really ment
> > was just that the addresses where the boot ROM stored the
> > information about the boot device etc. gets overwriteen when the SPL
>
> For clarity,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 06:08:32PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20190312140417.GJ4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > To answer that, no, I don't suppose there's a problem with auditing the
> > code to make sure that we can pass in gd, rather than U-Boot proper
> >
Dear Tom,
In message <20190312140417.GJ4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> To answer that, no, I don't suppose there's a problem with auditing the
> code to make sure that we can pass in gd, rather than U-Boot proper
> assuming it's the first thing to touch gd, if configured.
> But that to
> me
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 02:42:02PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20190312121957.GI4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, doable ... but the question is more, do we really want to read
> > > such infos twice, instead reading them in SPL and passing them from
> > >
Dear Tom,
In message <20190312121957.GI4690@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> > Yes, doable ... but the question is more, do we really want to read
> > such infos twice, instead reading them in SPL and passing them from
> > SPL to U-Boot ?
>
> Probably so, yes. Since we're talking about SPL and a
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:37:20PM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> Am 12.03.2019 um 12:16 schrieb Tom Rini:
> >On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 09:21:36AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>Hello Simon, Tom,
> >>
> >>I am just stumbeld on an am437x basd board over the problem to pass
> >>the
Hello Tom,
Am 12.03.2019 um 12:16 schrieb Tom Rini:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 09:21:36AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Simon, Tom,
I am just stumbeld on an am437x basd board over the problem to pass
the bootmode from SPL to U-Boot. On am437x the bootmode info get
overwritten from SPL
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 09:21:36AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Simon, Tom,
>
> I am just stumbeld on an am437x basd board over the problem to pass
> the bootmode from SPL to U-Boot. On am437x the bootmode info get
> overwritten from SPL stack, and I need this info in U-Boot.
>
> Hack
Hello Simon, Tom,
Am 12.03.2019 um 09:21 schrieb Heiko Schocher:
Hello Simon, Tom,
I am just stumbeld on an am437x basd board over the problem to pass
the bootmode from SPL to U-Boot. On am437x the bootmode info get
overwritten from SPL stack, and I need this info in U-Boot.
Hack would be to
Hello Simon, Tom,
I am just stumbeld on an am437x basd board over the problem to pass
the bootmode from SPL to U-Boot. On am437x the bootmode info get
overwritten from SPL stack, and I need this info in U-Boot.
Hack would be to move SPL stack to another address, but we loose
than 0xa000 size
24 matches
Mail list logo
