Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:34:32 +0800, Da Shi Cao
wrote:
> No, I didn't use that option. This option should fix it.
Please also look at other options used for hello_world, as you might hit
other compatibility-related issues if you're not using the same ones.
> Thanks a lot.
No prob
No, I didn't use that option. This option should fix it.
Thanks a lot.
Thomas
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hello Dashi Cao,
>
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:12:35 +0800, Da Shi Cao
> wrote:
>> In standalone applications, it seems that the execution of printf
>> function in
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 07:12:35 AM, Da Shi Cao wrote:
> In standalone applications, it seems that the execution of printf
> function in U-Boot is dependent on the value of register R9, which is
> setup in app_startup. But r9 can be used by your program at the
> decision of gcc compilation
Hello Dashi Cao,
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:12:35 +0800, Da Shi Cao
wrote:
> In standalone applications, it seems that the execution of printf
> function in U-Boot is dependent on the value of register R9, which is
> setup in app_startup. But r9 can be used by your program at the
> decision of gcc co
In standalone applications, it seems that the execution of printf
function in U-Boot is dependent on the value of register R9, which is
setup in app_startup. But r9 can be used by your program at the
decision of gcc compilation which is not aware of this dependence.
This is especially the case if +
5 matches
Mail list logo