On 08/10/2015 11:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi York,
>
> On 7 August 2015 at 17:12, York Sun wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/07/2015 03:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi York,
>>>
>>> On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote:
Simon,
I was doing an experiment to put the load address
Hi York,
On 7 August 2015 at 17:12, York Sun wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2015 03:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi York,
>>
>> On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote:
>>>
>>> Simon,
>>>
>>> I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of
>>> Linux to
>>> higher than 32-bit add
On 08/07/2015 03:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi York,
>
> On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote:
>>
>> Simon,
>>
>> I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of Linux
>> to
>> higher than 32-bit address. I found it is broken to process more than 32-bit
>> addresse
Hi York,
On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote:
>
> Simon,
>
> I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of Linux
> to
> higher than 32-bit address. I found it is broken to process more than 32-bit
> addresses. When I attempted to fix it, I was troubled by those cod
Simon,
I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of Linux to
higher than 32-bit address. I found it is broken to process more than 32-bit
addresses. When I attempted to fix it, I was troubled by those code used for
both host and target, like common/image-fit.c. For exampl
5 matches
Mail list logo