Re: [U-Boot] u-boot FIT image support

2015-08-10 Thread York Sun
On 08/10/2015 11:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi York, > > On 7 August 2015 at 17:12, York Sun wrote: >> >> >> On 08/07/2015 03:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi York, >>> >>> On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote: Simon, I was doing an experiment to put the load address

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot FIT image support

2015-08-10 Thread Simon Glass
Hi York, On 7 August 2015 at 17:12, York Sun wrote: > > > On 08/07/2015 03:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi York, >> >> On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote: >>> >>> Simon, >>> >>> I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of >>> Linux to >>> higher than 32-bit add

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot FIT image support

2015-08-07 Thread York Sun
On 08/07/2015 03:47 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi York, > > On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote: >> >> Simon, >> >> I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of Linux >> to >> higher than 32-bit address. I found it is broken to process more than 32-bit >> addresse

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot FIT image support

2015-08-07 Thread Simon Glass
Hi York, On 7 August 2015 at 14:48, York Sun wrote: > > Simon, > > I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of Linux > to > higher than 32-bit address. I found it is broken to process more than 32-bit > addresses. When I attempted to fix it, I was troubled by those cod

[U-Boot] u-boot FIT image support

2015-08-07 Thread York Sun
Simon, I was doing an experiment to put the load address and entry address of Linux to higher than 32-bit address. I found it is broken to process more than 32-bit addresses. When I attempted to fix it, I was troubled by those code used for both host and target, like common/image-fit.c. For exampl