On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 09:42:25AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by
> default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This
> in turn exposed that in our tests if guestmount is available but fails
> we do not fall bac
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 07:42, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by
> default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This
> in turn exposed that in our tests if guestmount is available but fails
> we do not fall back to trying
On 7/9/20 7:42 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by
> default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This
> in turn exposed that in our tests if guestmount is available but fails
> we do not fall back to trying to use sudo.
Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by
default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This
in turn exposed that in our tests if guestmount is available but fails
we do not fall back to trying to use sudo. Restructure our code to try
sudo if guest
4 matches
Mail list logo