Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-22 Thread Michal Simek
On 2/23/24 17:18, Michal Simek wrote: There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system without SPL. Pretty much this is cover all systems which are using only boot.bin which contains all images inside. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek --- board/xilinx/common/board.c | 2 +- 1 file

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-14 Thread Michal Simek
Hi, On 3/14/24 09:34, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: Hi Michal On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 09:01, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 08:42, Michal Simek wrote: On 3/12/24 20:12, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 17:55, Michal Simek wrote: On 3/12/24 07:14, Ilias

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-14 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
Hi Michal On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 09:01, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 08:42, Michal Simek wrote: > > > > > > > > On 3/12/24 20:12, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 17:55, Michal Simek wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 3/12/24 07:14, Ilias Apalodimas

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-13 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 08:42, Michal Simek wrote: > > > > On 3/12/24 20:12, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 17:55, Michal Simek wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 3/12/24 07:14, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > >>> Hi Michal > >>> > >>> Apologies for the late reply > >>> > >>> On Wed, 6

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-13 Thread Michal Simek
On 3/12/24 20:12, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 17:55, Michal Simek wrote: On 3/12/24 07:14, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: Hi Michal Apologies for the late reply On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 09:48, Michal Simek wrote: On 3/5/24 16:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Fri, Feb 23,

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-12 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 17:55, Michal Simek wrote: > > > > On 3/12/24 07:14, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > Hi Michal > > > > Apologies for the late reply > > > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 09:48, Michal Simek wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 3/5/24 16:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-12 Thread Michal Simek
On 3/12/24 07:14, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: Hi Michal Apologies for the late reply On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 09:48, Michal Simek wrote: On 3/5/24 16:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-12 Thread Michal Simek
On 3/12/24 13:29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 05.03.24 16:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system without SPL. Pretty much this is cover all systems which are using only boot.bin which

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-12 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 05.03.24 16:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system without SPL. Pretty much this is cover all systems which are using only boot.bin which contains all images inside. Signed-off-by: Michal

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-12 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
Hi Michal Apologies for the late reply On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 09:48, Michal Simek wrote: > > > > On 3/5/24 16:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > >> There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system without SPL. Pretty > >> much this

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-05 Thread Michal Simek
On 3/5/24 16:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system without SPL. Pretty much this is cover all systems which are using only boot.bin which contains all images inside. Signed-off-by: Michal

Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

2024-03-05 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system without SPL. Pretty > much this is cover all systems which are using only boot.bin which contains > all images inside. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > --- > >