Re: [PATCH] serial_lpuart: make clock failure less verbose

2020-02-10 Thread Giulio Benetti
+Cc Stefano On 2/1/20 1:48 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: Hi Giulio, Hi Lukasz, On 1/31/20 7:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 06:39, Giulio Benetti wrote: Some device may enable CONFIG_CLK but not still support this clock in CC, so better use debug() in place of dev_warn()

Re: [PATCH] serial_lpuart: make clock failure less verbose

2020-02-01 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Giulio, > Hi Lukasz, > > On 1/31/20 7:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 06:39, Giulio Benetti > > wrote: > >> > >> Some device may enable CONFIG_CLK but not still support this clock > >> in CC, so better use debug() in place of dev_warn() otherwise a > >> lot of > >

Re: [PATCH] serial_lpuart: make clock failure less verbose

2020-01-31 Thread Giulio Benetti
Hi Lukasz, On 1/31/20 7:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 06:39, Giulio Benetti wrote: Some device may enable CONFIG_CLK but not still support this clock in CC, so better use debug() in place of dev_warn() otherwise a lot of ^^ this must be CCF. Can you correct commit log

Re: [PATCH] serial_lpuart: make clock failure less verbose

2020-01-31 Thread Simon Glass
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 06:39, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > Some device may enable CONFIG_CLK but not still support this clock in > CC, so better use debug() in place of dev_warn() otherwise a lot of > boards will throw useless dev_warn()s. > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti > --- >