Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: simplify lookup_data_extent()

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > After returning if ret <= 0 we know that ret > 0. No need to check it. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo > Reviewed-by: Anand Jain Applied to u-boot/next, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc

Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: simplify lookup_data_extent()

On 2022/5/11 06:48, Qu Wenruo wrote: On 2022/5/11 03:43, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: After returning if ret <= 0 we know that ret > 0. No need to check it. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Just to mention for other guys in the btrfs list, this patch is for

Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: simplify lookup_data_extent()

On 5/11/22 01:13, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: After returning if ret <= 0 we know that ret > 0. No need to check it. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt Reviewed-by: Anand Jain --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 15 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: simplify lookup_data_extent()

On 2022/5/11 03:43, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: After returning if ret <= 0 we know that ret > 0. No need to check it. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Thanks, Qu --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 15 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff