On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 01:21:15PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:54:13PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:32:53PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 18:40, Tom Rini
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:54:13PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:32:53PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 18:40, Tom Rini
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I think the commit in question can be
> > > > > > > > > > summarized as
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:40 PM Sébastien Szymanski
wrote:
>
> Commit 5d7a95f4 ("imx6ul/imx6ull: synchronise device trees with
> linux") removed the display timings from the board device tree whereas
> they are still needed by the mxsfb driver.
> Add the timings back (the correct ones) in
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:35 AM Tom Rini wrote:
> For v2024.04 yes, this is fine. For long term, we should parse the new
> timing properties that the simple panel driver takes in our simple panel
> driver instead.
Sounds good.
Sébastien, please follow Tom's suggestion when you have a chance.
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:04:28AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:42 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > What's the long term fix here? Why aren't these needed in Linux anymore,
> > and perhaps why was it OK to remove them? This is perhaps another case
> > where we as
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:42 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> What's the long term fix here? Why aren't these needed in Linux anymore,
> and perhaps why was it OK to remove them? This is perhaps another case
> where we as the U-Boot community need to go and talk with some Linux
> Kernel community
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:32:53PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Replying here because this is only version of this in my inbox atm.
Please note that for additional context, in 2019 when d9aa4d4fca67 ("ARM:
dts: opos6uldev: use OF graph to describe the display") was merged
re-sync of DTS
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 10:17:35AM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> On 3/1/24 07:02, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:17:28AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
>
Hey,
Replying here because this is only version of this in my inbox atm.
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 10:17:35AM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> On 3/1/24 07:02, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>
On 3/1/24 07:02, Sumit Garg wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:17:28AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:50, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:44:42PM +0530,
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 19:31, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:17:28AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:50, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:44:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:17:28AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:50, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:44:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > + Shawn, Krzysztof, Conor
> > > >
> > > > Hi
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:17:28AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:50, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:44:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > + Shawn, Krzysztof, Conor
> > >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 18:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
>
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:50, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:44:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > + Shawn, Krzysztof, Conor
> >
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 18:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:44:42PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> + Shawn, Krzysztof, Conor
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 18:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:40:01PM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
+ Shawn, Krzysztof, Conor
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 18:40, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:40:01PM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> > > Commit 5d7a95f4 ("imx6ul/imx6ull: synchronise device trees with
>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:40:01PM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> > Commit 5d7a95f4 ("imx6ul/imx6ull: synchronise device trees with
> > linux") removed the display timings from the board device tree whereas
> > they are
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:40:01PM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> Commit 5d7a95f4 ("imx6ul/imx6ull: synchronise device trees with
> linux") removed the display timings from the board device tree whereas
> they are still needed by the mxsfb driver.
> Add the timings back (the correct ones)
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:40:01PM +0100, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> Commit 5d7a95f4 ("imx6ul/imx6ull: synchronise device trees with
> linux") removed the display timings from the board device tree whereas
> they are still needed by the mxsfb driver.
> Add the timings back (the correct
19 matches
Mail list logo
