Re: [RFC PATCH] dts: automatically build necessary .dtb files

2022-02-08 Thread Simon Glass
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 08:15, Simon Glass wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 14:15, Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: > > > > On 24/01/2022 18.57, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 09:02, Tom Rini wrote: > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Rasmus

Re: [RFC PATCH] dts: automatically build necessary .dtb files

2022-02-08 Thread Simon Glass
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 14:15, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On 24/01/2022 18.57, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 09:02, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> > >>> When building for a custom board, it is quite

Re: [RFC PATCH] dts: automatically build necessary .dtb files

2022-01-24 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 24/01/2022 18.57, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 09:02, Tom Rini wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> >>> When building for a custom board, it is quite common to maintain a >>> private branch which include some defconfig and

Re: [RFC PATCH] dts: automatically build necessary .dtb files

2022-01-24 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 09:02, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > > When building for a custom board, it is quite common to maintain a > > private branch which include some defconfig and .dts files. But to > > hook up those .dts files

Re: [RFC PATCH] dts: automatically build necessary .dtb files

2022-01-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > When building for a custom board, it is quite common to maintain a > private branch which include some defconfig and .dts files. But to > hook up those .dts files requires modifying a file "belonging" to > upstream U-Boot, the