Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Stephen Warren
On 08/06/2012 06:19 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: As discussed here [http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158202/] we want to use USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC still. However commit 5286f1ce dropped it regardless. Adding this back fixes a hang while handing over from SPL to U-Boot on Colibri T20. This probably

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2012, 11:00 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren: On 08/06/2012 06:19 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: As discussed here [http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158202/] we want to use USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC still. However commit 5286f1ce dropped it regardless. Adding this back fixes a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Allen Martin
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:09:00AM -0700, Lucas Stach wrote: Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2012, 11:00 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren: On 08/06/2012 06:19 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: As discussed here [http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158202/] we want to use USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC still. However

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Lucas Stach
Hi Allen, Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2012, 10:43 -0700 schrieb Allen Martin: On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:09:00AM -0700, Lucas Stach wrote: Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2012, 11:00 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren: On 08/06/2012 06:19 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: As discussed here

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Lucas Stach, In message 1344298788-7059-1-git-send-email-...@lynxeye.de you wrote: As discussed here [http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158202/] we want to use USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC still. However commit 5286f1ce dropped it regardless. Adding this back fixes a hang while handing over from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Allen Martin
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:53:00AM -0700, Lucas Stach wrote: Hi Allen, Tell me what CodeSourcery version you're using and I'll test it here as well and see if I can reproduce the problem. I used CodeSourcery arm-2011.09-70-arm-none-linux-gnueabi to test this. And to answer Tom's

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Allen Martin
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:53:00AM -0700, Lucas Stach wrote: Hi Allen, And to answer Tom's question: the failure was that the real U-Boot would not come up after the SPL. All I could see was the one line printed by the SPL and nothing more. I think I found the problem. It's the following

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2012, 15:28 -0700 schrieb Allen Martin: On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:53:00AM -0700, Lucas Stach wrote: Hi Allen, And to answer Tom's question: the failure was that the real U-Boot would not come up after the SPL. All I could see was the one line printed by the SPL

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra20: add back USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC

2012-08-07 Thread Allen Martin
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:42:45PM -0700, Lucas Stach wrote: Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2012, 15:28 -0700 schrieb Allen Martin: On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:53:00AM -0700, Lucas Stach wrote: Hi Allen, And to answer Tom's question: the failure was that the real U-Boot would not come up