On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 08:54:26 -0400
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Mark Kettenis
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> I suppose special case handling in efi_load_image() wouldn't be too
> bad. It won't fix every theoretical problem on armv7 without
> unaligned access disabled.
>
s/disabled/enabled/
BR,
-R
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 08:54:26 -0400
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Rob Clark
>> >>
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 08:54:26 -0400
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Rob Clark
> >> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:18:50 -0400
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:18:50 -0400
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Alexander Graf
>> >>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 08:01:10AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Leif Lindholm
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:11:14AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 8 August 2017 at 07:52, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> >> Am
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:18:50 -0400
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Alexander Graf
> >> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:19:37 +0100
> >>
> >> On 05.08.17 21:31, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:11:14AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 8 August 2017 at 07:52, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Am 07.08.2017 um 23:18 schrieb Rob Clark :
>>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:11:14AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 8 August 2017 at 07:52, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Am 07.08.2017 um 23:18 schrieb Rob Clark :
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark Kettenis
> >>
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Am 07.08.2017 um 23:18 schrieb Rob Clark :
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
From: Alexander Graf
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017
On 8 August 2017 at 07:52, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Am 07.08.2017 um 23:18 schrieb Rob Clark :
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
From: Alexander Graf
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017
> Am 07.08.2017 um 23:18 schrieb Rob Clark :
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> From: Alexander Graf
>>> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:19:37 +0100
>>>
On 05.08.17 21:31, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Alexander Graf
>> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:19:37 +0100
>>
>> On 05.08.17 21:31, Rob Clark wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>> > wrote:
>> >>
> From: Alexander Graf
> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:19:37 +0100
>
> On 05.08.17 21:31, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >> On 08/05/2017 08:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Rob
On 05.08.17 21:31, Rob Clark wrote:
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 08/05/2017 08:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 06:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >> On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> Some arch's have trouble with unaligned
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2017 06:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> wrote:
On
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 08:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> wrote:
On
On 08/05/2017 08:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2017 06:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2017 06:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> wrote:
On
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 06:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
Some arch's have trouble with
On 08/05/2017 06:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> Some arch's have trouble with unaligned accesses. Technically
>>> EFI device-path structs should be byte aligned, and the
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 06:19 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> wrote:
On
On 08/05/2017 06:19 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
Some arch's have trouble with unaligned
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> Some arch's have trouble with unaligned accesses. Technically
>>> EFI device-path structs
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> Some arch's have trouble with unaligned accesses. Technically
>> EFI device-path structs should be byte aligned, and the next node
>> in the path starts immediately after
On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Some arch's have trouble with unaligned accesses. Technically
> EFI device-path structs should be byte aligned, and the next node
> in the path starts immediately after the previous. Meaning that
> a pointer to an 'struct efi_device_path' is not
27 matches
Mail list logo