Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: sun50i-h5.dtsi : add h5 & a64 compatible to mmc[0-2]

2017-10-16 Thread Jagan Teki
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Antony Antony wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel? >> > > I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: sun50i-h5.dtsi : add h5 & a64 compatible to mmc[0-2]

2017-10-10 Thread Antony Antony
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel? > I guess syncing could possibly solve the problem! Kernel DTSI got the compiltables I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: sun50i-h5.dtsi : add h5 & a64 compatible to mmc[0-2]

2017-10-10 Thread Jagan Teki
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel? And add last merge commit details on commit message. thanks! -- Jagan Teki Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com U-Boot, Linux | Upstream

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: sun50i-h5.dtsi : add h5 & a64 compatible to mmc[0-2]

2017-10-10 Thread Peter Robinson
Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel? On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Antony Antony wrote: > add more specific, Allwinner H5 SoC, compaitable to mmc0,1,2 > current one comes from sun8i-h3.dtsi > compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-mmc",