Hi Tom,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Ilya Yanok ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.comwrote:
Yes. What I meant was that not all of the stuff that is guarded today
is garbage collected so the resulting image is larger than it must be.
Yep. And that's actually goes beyond the subject of this
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ilya Yanok
ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.com wrote:
__u_boot_cmd* symbols are not used in SPL so there is no need
to tell the linker that they are undefined. With these symbols
marked as
On 08/06/2012 08:10 AM, Ilya Yanok wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
mailto:tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ilya Yanok
ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.com
mailto:ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.com wrote:
__u_boot_cmd* symbols
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On 08/06/2012 08:10 AM, Ilya Yanok wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
mailto:tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ilya Yanok
ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.com
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Ilya Yanok
ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On 08/06/2012 08:10 AM, Ilya Yanok wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
mailto:tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun,
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
OK, installed and it's still larger with this change than without and
it's not garbage collecting and dropping commands if I un-guard the
nandecc command for example. Tested with omap3_beagle.
Did some testing as well.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:15:25PM +0400, Ilya Yanok wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
OK, installed and it's still larger with this change than without and
it's not garbage collecting and dropping commands if I un-guard the
nandecc command
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
By comparing of two images I've found that the difference comes from
ro-strings (two help strings in U_BOOT_CMD, string in printf, sw
hw).
It looks like the linker doesn't collect ro-strings referenced from
collected
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ilya Yanok
ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.com wrote:
__u_boot_cmd* symbols are not used in SPL so there is no need
to tell the linker that they are undefined. With these symbols
marked as undefined linker fails to garbage collect some unused
functions and even fails
9 matches
Mail list logo
