Dear Simon Glass,
In message CAPnjgZ2jS8kzCt06LbYnXSyEKm6ck8apm=p1yqqdtnz0+q9...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
Well let's see how we go with the incremental approach - hopefully we
can get the same result with less pain and risk, and not too much
work.
Did you miss my proposal not to change
Hi Wolfgang,
On 03/01/12 19:12, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
CAPnjgZ2jS8kzCt06LbYnXSyEKm6ck8apm=p1yqqdtnz0+q9...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Well let's see how we go with the incremental approach - hopefully we
can get the same result with less pain and risk, and not
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
CAPnjgZ2jS8kzCt06LbYnXSyEKm6ck8apm=p1yqqdtnz0+q9...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Well let's see how we go with the incremental approach - hopefully we
can get the same result with
Dear Simon Glass,
In message CAPnjgZ3592m_m=tmafptwzo+_o94veykvrffdgpp599igef...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I have brought in PPC to board_f.c and board_r.c but not dealt with
relocation. Once I have done that, gone through the new x86 series
again and MAKEALL doesn't scream too loudly I'll
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
CAPnjgZ3592m_m=tmafptwzo+_o94veykvrffdgpp599igef...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I have brought in PPC to board_f.c and board_r.c but not dealt with
relocation. Once I have done
Hi Simon,
In case you haven't noticed (I did not Cc you or Wolfgang, sorry 'bout
that) I've posted the cleaned up version of my x86 init refactoring...
On 02/01/12 10:48, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4f019473.8000...@gmail.com you wrote:
The problem is not one of how sparsely the test/fix cycles are spread over
time, it is one of spreading the breakage over multiple patches - If you
are replacing functionality then add the new functionality, add the hooks
to
Hi Graham,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
In case you haven't noticed (I did not Cc you or Wolfgang, sorry 'bout
that) I've posted the cleaned up version of my x86 init refactoring...
Yes I see it - thats great thanks. I will go through it
Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4f019473.8000...@gmail.com you wrote:
The problem is not one of how sparsely the test/fix cycles are spread over
time, it is one of spreading the breakage over multiple patches - If
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
CAPnjgZ1Zim6=u3rlcnake-0bw3so_hry+u67jkpknoni8g7...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Also it does depend on expectations. I would hope that moving an
architecture over would be a fairly
Hi Graeme,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 31/12/11 13:02, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
[snip]
However, I think this approach is not the right
Dear Simon Glass,
In message CAPnjgZ1eutEboyvEtYcxcZcv=1z_3tkq_45wbrgndpsnxrt...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
- getting generic relocation working
I don;t see why this would be a direct prerequisite here. =A0We want to
have that, no boubt about that. =A0But it appears to be an unrelated
Hi Simon,
On 31/12/11 13:02, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
[snip]
However, I think this approach is not the right one - and I think the CFI
driver backs me up. Your plan is to create generic code which
Dear Simon Glass,
In message CAPnjgZ1Zim6=u3rlcnake-0bw3so_hry+u67jkpknoni8g7...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
Also it does depend on expectations. I would hope that moving an
architecture over would be a fairly small task:
- getting generic relocation working
I don;t see why this would be a
Hi Simon,
Sorry for the delay in reviewing this - I've been doing a lot of work on
the x86 side of things. I now have a working solution to the
board_init_f_r() / global data clobbering problem which involves having the
gd 'variable' as a register like all other arch's. The solution is
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4efddd7d.50...@gmail.com you wrote:
I honestly think we should get the x86 init sequence patches finalised
first for several reasons:
- Because x86 is so small, it provides a good test-bed - ELF relocation
was first finalised on x86 (it came and went with
Hi Graeme,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
Sorry for the delay in reviewing this - I've been doing a lot of work on
the x86 side of things. I now have a working solution to the
board_init_f_r() / global data clobbering problem which
Dear Simon,
In message 1325054160-24894-1-git-send-email-...@chromium.org you wrote:
This series creates a generic board.c implementation which contains
the essential functions of the various arch/xxx/lib/board.c files.
I'll be loking into this deeper when I'm back at work (i. e. starting
with
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon,
In message 1325054160-24894-1-git-send-email-...@chromium.org you wrote:
This series creates a generic board.c implementation which contains
the essential functions of the various arch/xxx/lib/board.c
19 matches
Mail list logo
