On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:22:37AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 07/09/2016 02:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:48:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>On 07/08/2016 06:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:18:35PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >>>
> As
On 07/09/2016 02:28 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:48:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 07/08/2016 06:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:18:35PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
As printf calls may be executed quite early, we should avoid using any
BSS stored
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:48:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 06:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:18:35PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >
> >>As printf calls may be executed quite early, we should avoid using any
> >>BSS stored variables, since some boards put
On 07/08/2016 06:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:18:35PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
As printf calls may be executed quite early, we should avoid using any
BSS stored variables, since some boards put BSS in DRAM, which may not
have been initialised yet.
Explicitly mark those
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:18:35PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> As printf calls may be executed quite early, we should avoid using any
> BSS stored variables, since some boards put BSS in DRAM, which may not
> have been initialised yet.
> Explicitly mark those "static global" variables as
5 matches
Mail list logo