Re: [U-Boot] status several (bugfix) patches...

2009-11-04 Thread Tom
Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hi, > >>> [patch] ARM: Use Linux version for unaligned access code >>> >> This one is in arm/next >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/063437.html > > Well, I thought we agreed to include (the updated version from Stefan) > in the current release? > > Remy I

Re: [U-Boot] status several (bugfix) patches...

2009-11-04 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, >> [patch] ARM: Use Linux version for unaligned access code >> > This one is in arm/next > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/063437.html Well, I thought we agreed to include (the updated version from Stefan) in the current release? Remy __

Re: [U-Boot] status several (bugfix) patches...

2009-11-04 Thread Ben Warren
Remy, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hi All, > > Did anybody take a look already at these patches? > > fixes: > [PATCH] Building of FIT images does not work > [PATCH] Fix mingw tools build > [PATCH] Repair the 'netry=once' option. > Slated for net/next. Not there yet, though. > [patch v2] Repair build f

Re: [U-Boot] status several (bugfix) patches...

2009-11-04 Thread Tom
Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hi All, > > Did anybody take a look already at these patches? > > fixes: > [PATCH] Building of FIT images does not work > [PATCH] Fix mingw tools build > [PATCH] Repair the 'netry=once' option. > [patch v2] Repair build fail in case CONFIG_PPC=n and CONFIG_FIT=y > [patch] A