Re: sunxi/arm64 build broken (was: [PATCH v4 12/27] x86: Makefile: Drop explicit targets built by binman)

2020-08-07 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Samuel, On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 22:20, Samuel Holland wrote: > > On 8/5/20 1:25 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> The last build steps with your patch are: > >>> > >>> cat spl/sunxi-spl.bin u-boot.itb > u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin > >>> ./tools/binman/binman --toolpath ./tools build -u -d u-boot.dtb

Re: sunxi/arm64 build broken (was: [PATCH v4 12/27] x86: Makefile: Drop explicit targets built by binman)

2020-08-07 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 22:20, Samuel Holland wrote: > > On 8/5/20 1:25 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> The last build steps with your patch are: > >>> > >>> cat spl/sunxi-spl.bin u-boot.itb > u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin > >>> ./tools/binman/binman --toolpath ./tools build -u -d u-boot.dtb -O . >

Re: sunxi/arm64 build broken (was: [PATCH v4 12/27] x86: Makefile: Drop explicit targets built by binman)

2020-08-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi André, On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 09:21, André Przywara wrote: > > On 05/08/2020 16:05, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi André, > > > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:20, André Przywara wrote: > >> > >> On 19/07/2020 20:56, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> On x86 various files that need to be

Re: sunxi/arm64 build broken (was: [PATCH v4 12/27] x86: Makefile: Drop explicit targets built by binman)

2020-08-05 Thread André Przywara
On 05/08/2020 16:05, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi André, > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:20, André Przywara wrote: >> >> On 19/07/2020 20:56, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> On x86 various files that need to be created by binman. It does not make >>> sense to enumerate these in the Makefile. They

Re: sunxi/arm64 build broken (was: [PATCH v4 12/27] x86: Makefile: Drop explicit targets built by binman)

2020-08-05 Thread Simon Glass
Hi André, On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:20, André Przywara wrote: > > On 19/07/2020 20:56, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > On x86 various files that need to be created by binman. It does not make > > sense to enumerate these in the Makefile. They are described in the > > configuration (devicetree)