[PATCH 17/18] rockchip: rk3588: bind MMC controllers in U-Boot proper pre-reloc

From: Quentin Schulz Since commit 9e644284ab81 ("dm: core: Report bootph-pre-ram/sram node as pre-reloc after relocation"), bootph-pre-ram doesn't make U-Boot proper bind the device before relocation. While this is usually not much of an issue, it is when there's a lookup for devic

Re: [PATCH v8 13/16] arm: dts: Introduce am69-sk u-boot dts files

On 22/01/24 18:28, Roger Quadros wrote: On 19/01/2024 19:50, Apurva Nandan wrote: From: Dasnavis Sabiya Introduce the base dts files needed for u-boot or to augment the linux dtbs for use in the u-boot-spl and u-boot binaries. Signed-off-by: Dasnavis Sabiya Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan

Re: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

Hi Tom, sorry about that. Please find attached a patch. Can you please review? Thanks, Hugo

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

ronisation of the DTs, > > however have one comment about the upcoming sync process: > > > > > ... > > > However, Linux kernel DT maintainers proposed [2] for U-Boot to rather > > > use devicetree-rebasing repo [3] which is a forked copy from Linux > >

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

I've now updated to the latest Coverity scan tool and that eliminated some previous defects and found two new ones: -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 6:42 PM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot To: Hi, Please find the latest

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

Hey all, Here's the latest Coverity scan report. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 6:26 PM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot To: Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Das U-Boot found with Coverity

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] rockchip: find U-boot proper boot device by inverting the logic that sets it

et by spl_node_to_boot_device() depending on the block > > > device number associated with the MMC device the SPL used to load U-Boot > > > proper from. It is NOT related to the mmc alias in the Device Tree. > > > > > > For SPI flashes, all SPI flashes will return

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

t; > ... > > However, Linux kernel DT maintainers proposed [2] for U-Boot to rather > > use devicetree-rebasing repo [3] which is a forked copy from Linux > > kernel for DT source files as well as bindings. It is tagged at every > > Linux kernel major release or intermideate

Re: Please pull u-boot-marvell/master

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:46:48PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Tom, > > please pull this next batch of Marvell related patches: > Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Please pull u-boot-marvell/master

: https://dev.azure.com/sr0718/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=334=results Thanks, Stefan The following changes since commit 3c04fcf3137d5f694d52b8f355373e4baabe5f78: Merge patch series "k3-j721e: beagleboneai: Fix USB" (2024-01-20 11:39:13 -0500) are available in the Git repositor

Re: Pull request: Please pull u-boot-imx-20240115

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:02:58AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. > > The following changes since commit 3c04fcf3137d5f694d52b8f355373e4baabe5f78: > > Merge patch series "k3-j721e: beagleboneai: Fix USB"

Pull request: Please pull u-boot-imx-20240115

Hi Tom, Please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. The following changes since commit 3c04fcf3137d5f694d52b8f355373e4baabe5f78: Merge patch series "k3-j721e: beagleboneai: Fix USB" (2024-01-20 11:39:13 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/cu

Re: [PATCH v8 13/16] arm: dts: Introduce am69-sk u-boot dts files

On 19/01/2024 19:50, Apurva Nandan wrote: > From: Dasnavis Sabiya > > Introduce the base dts files needed for u-boot or to augment the linux > dtbs for use in the u-boot-spl and u-boot binaries. > > Signed-off-by: Dasnavis Sabiya > Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan

Re: [PATCH u-boot v2019.04-aspeed-openbmc] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add Ampere's BMC platform (AST2600)

}; + +    aliases { +    spi0 = +    ethernet0 = +    }; + +    cpus { +    cpu@0 { +    clock-frequency = <8>; +    }; +    cpu@1 { +    clock-frequency = <8>; +    }; +    }; +}; + + { +    u-boot,dm-pre-relo

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:05:36 +0530 Sumit Garg wrote: Hi, I certainly welcome this more automatic synchronisation of the DTs, however have one comment about the upcoming sync process: > ... > However, Linux kernel DT maintainers proposed [2] for U-Boot to rather > use devicetree-reba

[PATCH v5 3/7] siemens draco: i2c: use driver model for u-boot

Add support for driver model where EEPROM data are read in draco board. Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin Signed-off-by: Enrico Leto --- configs/draco-etamin_defconfig | 4 +++- configs/draco-rastaban_defconfig | 4 +++- configs/draco-thuban_defconfig | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 9

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] rockchip: find U-boot proper boot device by inverting the logic that sets it

Hi Kever, On 1/18/24 11:12, Kever Yang wrote: Hi Quentin, On 2024/1/18 01:22, Quentin Schulz wrote: From: Quentin Schulz BOOT_DEVICE_* is set by spl_node_to_boot_device() depending on the block device number associated with the MMC device the SPL used to load U-Boot proper from

Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

Hi Heinrich, On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 17:47, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > > > *** CID 478333: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) > /lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c: 413 in

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

On 1/21/24 23:41, Caleb Connolly wrote: Hi, [...] How do you propose to handle fixes to DTs which are applied to linux-stable releases ? For example, if Linux 6.6(.0) ships a DT which has some defect that is fixed in 6.6.1, how will that fix get into U-Boot DTs ? This fix would also

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:41:51PM +, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > On 21/01/2024 15:33, Marek Vasut wrote: [snip] > > Assume that there is some large breaking change in Linux 6.(n+1), > > something which would be problematic for specific U-Boot platform (e.g. > > i

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

On 21/01/2024 15:33, Marek Vasut wrote: On 1/10/24 11:35, Sumit Garg wrote: Changes in v4: -- - Switched subtree to be imported as dts/upstream sub-directory rather    than devicetree-rebasing sub-directory to better suite U-Boot    directory structure. - Since we now have v6.7

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

On 1/10/24 11:35, Sumit Garg wrote: Changes in v4: -- - Switched subtree to be imported as dts/upstream sub-directory rather than devicetree-rebasing sub-directory to better suite U-Boot directory structure. - Since we now have v6.7-dts tag available now, so switch subtree

Re: [PATCH v8 12/16] arm: dts: Introduce j784s4 u-boot dts files

;tifs-rm-cfg.yaml"; > +}; > + > + { > + tiboot3-j784s4-hs-evm.bin { > + filename = "tiboot3-j784s4-hs-evm.bin"; > + https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20240103174756.xa4rzbn4klk5gv2x@aware/ You haven't responded on thread why "Pr

[PATCH v8 13/16] arm: dts: Introduce am69-sk u-boot dts files

From: Dasnavis Sabiya Introduce the base dts files needed for u-boot or to augment the linux dtbs for use in the u-boot-spl and u-boot binaries. Signed-off-by: Dasnavis Sabiya Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan --- arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/dts/k3-am69-r5-sk.dts

Re: [PULL] Pull request for u-boot master / v2024.04 = u-boot-stm32-20240119

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 05:59:07PM +0100, Patrice CHOTARD wrote: > Hi Tom > > Please pull the STM32 related patches for u-boot/master, v2024.04: > u-boot-stm32-20240119 > > CI status: > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-stm/-/pipelines/19379 > >

[PULL] Pull request for u-boot master / v2024.04 = u-boot-stm32-20240119

Hi Tom Please pull the STM32 related patches for u-boot/master, v2024.04: u-boot-stm32-20240119 CI status: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-stm/-/pipelines/19379 The following changes since commit f7cca7ccc5117eaafcc2bde91ad1bed6fee7cfc3: Revert "test: hush: dollar

Re: Pull request: u-boot-rockchip-20240119

de; > - other misc fixes; > > CI: > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/pipelines/19374 > > Thanks, > - Kever > > The following changes since commit f7cca7ccc5117eaafcc2bde91ad1bed6fee7cfc3: > > Revert "test: hush: dollar: fix bugous

Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

On 16:05-20240110, Sumit Garg wrote: [...] > Prerequisite > > > This patch series requires devicetree-rebasing git repo to be added as a > subtree to the main U-Boot repo via: > > $ git subtree add --prefix dts/upstream \ > > git://git.kernel.o

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

*** CID 478333: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) /lib/efi_loader/efi_firmware.c: 413 in efi_firmware_set_fmp_state_var() 407 /* 408 * GetVariable may fail,

Pull request: u-boot-rockchip-20240119

Hi Tom, Please pull the updates for rockchip platform: - Add board: rk3328 FriendlyARM NanoPi R2C Plus, rk3588 Turing RK1 SoM; - Enable SPI boot for rk3588 and rk3528; - Set boot device in SPL as common code; - other misc fixes; CI: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

Here's the current set of new issues since I last ran Coverity. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:20 AM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot To: Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to Das U-Boot found

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

>>>>>> Le jeudi 28 décembre 2023, 21:58:59 CET Tom Rini a écrit : > >>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:02:20 +0100, Francis Laniel wrote: > >>>>>>>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new > >

[PATCH v5 4/6] rockchip: find U-boot proper boot device by inverting the logic that sets it

From: Quentin Schulz BOOT_DEVICE_* is set by spl_node_to_boot_device() depending on the block device number associated with the MMC device the SPL used to load U-Boot proper from. It is NOT related to the mmc alias in the Device Tree. For SPI flashes, all SPI flashes will return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI

[PATCH v5 0/6] rockchip: add vendor-wide support for detecting U-Boot proper boot medium

It is possible to boot U-Boot proper from a different storage medium than the one used by the BOOTROM to load the SPL. This information is stored in the u-boot,spl-boot-device Device Tree property and is accessible from U-Boot proper so that it has knowledge at runtime where it was loaded from

[PATCH v4 4/6] rockchip: find U-boot proper boot device by inverting the logic that sets it

From: Quentin Schulz BOOT_DEVICE_* is set by spl_node_to_boot_device() depending on the block device number associated with the MMC device the SPL used to load U-Boot proper from. It is NOT related to the mmc alias in the Device Tree. For SPI flashes, all SPI flashes will return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI

[PATCH v4 0/6] rockchip: add vendor-wide support for detecting U-Boot proper boot medium

It is possible to boot U-Boot proper from a different storage medium than the one used by the BOOTROM to load the SPL. This information is stored in the u-boot,spl-boot-device Device Tree property and is accessible from U-Boot proper so that it has knowledge at runtime where it was loaded from

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] rockchip: find U-boot proper boot device by inverting the logic that sets it

Hi Quentin, On 2024/1/18 01:22, Quentin Schulz wrote: From: Quentin Schulz BOOT_DEVICE_* is set by spl_node_to_boot_device() depending on the block device number associated with the MMC device the SPL used to load U-Boot proper from. It is NOT related to the mmc alias in the Device Tree

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

t;> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:02:20 +0100, Francis Laniel wrote: >>>>>>>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new >>>>>>>>> shell, >>>>>>>>> based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. >>>>&

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] rockchip: find U-boot proper boot device by inverting the logic that sets it

On 2024/1/18 01:22, Quentin Schulz wrote: From: Quentin Schulz BOOT_DEVICE_* is set by spl_node_to_boot_device() depending on the block device number associated with the MMC device the SPL used to load U-Boot proper from. It is NOT related to the mmc alias in the Device Tree. For SPI

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

rote: > > >>>>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new > > >>>>>> shell, > > >>>>>> based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. > > >>>>>> While one of the goals of this contribution was to addr

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

t;>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new > >>>>>> shell, > >>>>>> based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. > >>>>>> While one of the goals of this contribution was to address the fact > >>>>

[PATCH v3 4/6] rockchip: find U-boot proper boot device by inverting the logic that sets it

From: Quentin Schulz BOOT_DEVICE_* is set by spl_node_to_boot_device() depending on the block device number associated with the MMC device the SPL used to load U-Boot proper from. It is NOT related to the mmc alias in the Device Tree. For SPI flashes, all SPI flashes will return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI

[PATCH v3 0/6] rockchip: add vendor-wide support for detecting U-Boot proper boot medium

It is possible to boot U-Boot proper from a different storage medium than the one used by the BOOTROM to load the SPL. This information is stored in the u-boot,spl-boot-device Device Tree property and is accessible from U-Boot proper so that it has knowledge at runtime where it was loaded from

[PATCH v2 1/1] cmd: bootmenu: rename U-Boot console to Exit

It seems that the U-Boot console entry of the bootmenu has lost its original meaning. Now, even if it is chosen, the probability that you will enter the actual U-Boot console is quite low. Boot env, bootflow, bootcommand script may appear, but not the actual console. Hence, let's remove ambiguity

[PATCH v2 0/1] bootmenu: rename U-Boot console to Exit

It seems that the U-Boot console entry of the bootmenu has lost its original meaning. Now, even if it is chosen, the probability that you will enter the actual U-Boot console is quite low. Boot env, bootflow, bootcommand script may appear, but not the actual console. Hense, let's remove ambiguity

Re: [PATCH next v2 4/6] rockchip: rk3588: insert u-boot,spl-boot-device into U-Boot device tree

Hi Quentin, On 2023/11/9 01:25, Quentin Schulz wrote: From: Quentin Schulz It is possible to boot U-Boot proper from a different storage medium than the one used by the BOOTROM to load the SPL. This information is stored in the u-boot,spl-boot-device Device Tree property and is accessible

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

iel wrote: >>>> Le jeudi 28 décembre 2023, 21:58:59 CET Tom Rini a écrit : >>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:02:20 +0100, Francis Laniel wrote: >>>>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new >>>>>> shell, >&

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

a écrit : > >>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:02:20 +0100, Francis Laniel wrote: > >>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new > >>>> shell, > >>>> based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. > >>>> While one of th

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

00, Francis Laniel wrote: > > > > During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new > > > > shell, > > > > based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. > > > > While one of the goals of this contribution was to address the fact >

Re: Pull request: Please pull u-boot-imx-20240115

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 11:45:54PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. > > The following changes since commit 547d3dd28a46a18d59e00a153c8becca8d4e8cf9: > > Merge branch '2024-01-12-assorted-fixes' (2024-01-12 08:34:50 -050

Re: [PULL] Pull request for u-boot-nand-20240115

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 11:48:12AM +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote: > Hello Tom, > > The following changes since commit 697758e7c81131da6db0e3b10515019fe3aca8c9: > > Merge branch 'master-sync-dts-663' of > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sh (2024-01-1

Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] arm: dts: k3-am625-sk: Enable usb port in u-boot

On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 12:17 +0100, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote: > Hi Sjoerd > > Thank you for the patch. > > On ven., janv. 12, 2024 at 09:52, Sjoerd Simons > wrote: > > > Enable usb0 in all boot phases for use with DFU > > > > Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v4:

Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] arm: dts: k3-am625-sk: Enable usb port in u-boot

Hi Sjoerd Thank you for the patch. On ven., janv. 12, 2024 at 09:52, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > Enable usb0 in all boot phases for use with DFU > > Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons > > --- > > Changes in v4: > - Don't force usb0 into peripheral mode I know that dr_mode = "peripheral" has been

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

te: >>>> Le jeudi 28 décembre 2023, 21:58:59 CET Tom Rini a écrit : >>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:02:20 +0100, Francis Laniel wrote: >>>>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new >>>>>> shell, >>>>&

Pull request: Please pull u-boot-imx-20240115

Hi Tom, Please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. The following changes since commit 547d3dd28a46a18d59e00a153c8becca8d4e8cf9: Merge branch '2024-01-12-assorted-fixes' (2024-01-12 08:34:50 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx.git

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

Rini a écrit : > >>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:02:20 +0100, Francis Laniel wrote: > >>>> During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new > >>>> shell, > >>>> based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. > >>>> While one

extlinux.conf file and fdtoverlay_addr_r (U-Boot 2022.01)

Hello, I am trying to load a custom device tree overlay file in the extlinux/extlinux.conf file (using Yocto [Kirkstone branch] and beaglebone yocto machine). At boot time u-boot complains: Invalid fdtoverlay_addr_r for loading overlays Full uboot output till that point: U-Boot 2022.01 (Jan

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot environment variables layout

023 at 06:34:16PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > > From: Rafał Miłecki > > > > > > > > > > U-Boot env data is a way of storing firmware variables. It's a format > > > > > that can be used of top of various stora

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

t; During 2021 summer, Sean Anderson wrote a contribution to add a new shell, >>>> based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. >>>> While one of the goals of this contribution was to address the fact actual >>>> U-Boot shell, which is based on Busybox hush, is old t

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot environment variables layout

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 10:10:13AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 4.01.2024 08:58, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > r...@kernel.org wrote on Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:11:29 -0700: > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:34:16PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > > From: Rafał Miłecki &g

[PULL] Pull request for u-boot-nand-20240115

Hello Tom, The following changes since commit 697758e7c81131da6db0e3b10515019fe3aca8c9: Merge branch 'master-sync-dts-663' of https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sh (2024-01-14 18:07:49 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot.git u

Re: [PULL] u-boot-sh/master-sync-dts-663

On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 11:46:02PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > The following changes since commit 817fdce324cac70fb4216ba42976f7b9c2ba9f99: > > Merge tag 'efi-2024-04-rc1' of > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi (2024-01-14 09:34:14 > -0500) > > are

[PULL] u-boot-sh/master-sync-dts-663

The following changes since commit 817fdce324cac70fb4216ba42976f7b9c2ba9f99: Merge tag 'efi-2024-04-rc1' of https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi (2024-01-14 09:34:14 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sh.git master

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] cmd: bootmenu: rename U-Boot console to Exit

14 січня 2024 р. 16:41:40 GMT+02:00, Peter Robinson написав(-ла): >On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 10:23, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: >> >> It seems that the U-Boot console entry of the bootmenu has lost >> its original meaning. Now, even if it is chosen, the probability >> tha

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] cmd: bootmenu: rename U-Boot console to Exit

On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 10:23, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > It seems that the U-Boot console entry of the bootmenu has lost > its original meaning. Now, even if it is chosen, the probability > that you will enter the actual U-Boot console is quite low. > Boot env, bootflow, bootcom

[PATCH v1 1/1] cmd: bootmenu: rename U-Boot console to Exit

It seems that the U-Boot console entry of the bootmenu has lost its original meaning. Now, even if it is chosen, the probability that you will enter the actual U-Boot console is quite low. Boot env, bootflow, bootcommand script may appear, but not the actual console. Hense, let's remove ambiguity

[PATCH v1 0/1] bootmenu: rename U-Boot console to Exit

It seems that the U-Boot console entry of the bootmenu has lost its original meaning. Now, even if it is chosen, the probability that you will enter the actual U-Boot console is quite low. Boot env, bootflow, bootcommand script may appear, but not the actual console. Hense, let's remove ambiguity

Re: Please pull u-boot-samsung master

Dear Tom, > > > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > > > > 2f0282922b2c458eea7f85c500a948a587437b63: > > > > > > > > > > Prepare v2024.01-rc4 (2023-12-04 13:46:56 -0500) &

Re: Please pull u-boot-samsung master

2f0282922b2c458eea7f85c500a948a587437b63: Prepare v2024.01-rc4 (2023-12-04 13:46:56 -0500) are available in the git repository at: g...@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-samsung.git master for you to fetch changes up to 5631d20e2ef1008d55569790f79672ea8cc6894b: pinctrl: exynos: Convert to use livetree

[PATCH v4 4/7] arm: dts: k3-am625-sk: Enable usb port in u-boot

Enable usb0 in all boot phases for use with DFU Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons --- Changes in v4: - Don't force usb0 into peripheral mode Changes in v3: - Enable usb nodes in all boot phases Changes in v2: - Only enable usb port 0 DFU in SPL arch/arm/dts/k3-am625-sk-u-boot.dtsi | 8

Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-dfu-20240111

ommand. > > - New 'fastboot oem console' command. Useful for debugging to send data > the u-boot shell via fastboot > > - Console recording fixes > > The CI job is at > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dfu/-/pipelines/19279 > > Thanks, &

Re: [PATCH v13 00/24] Modernize U-Boot shell

to add a new shell, > > > based on LIL, to U-Boot [1, 2]. > > > While one of the goals of this contribution was to address the fact actual > > > U-Boot shell, which is based on Busybox hush, is old there was a > > > discussion > > > about adding a new shell versus

[GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-dfu-20240111

Hi Tom, Here are some developments for master including: - Implement fastboot multi-response. This allows multi-line response and most importantly, finally adds support for fastboot getvar all command. - New 'fastboot oem console' command. Useful for debugging to send data the u-boot shell

Re: Please pull u-boot-samsung master

4 13:46:56 -0500) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > g...@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-samsung.git master > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 5631d20e2ef1008d55569790f79672ea8cc6894b: > > > > pin

Re: Please pull u-boot-marvell/master

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Tom, > > please pull this next batch of Marvell related patches: > Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Please pull u-boot-marvell/master

) Here the Azure build, without any issues: https://dev.azure.com/sr0718/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=331=results Thanks, Stefan The following changes since commit 344667db6450de838bd83f0f57e177e6d4744d89: Merge tag 'smbios-2024-04-rc1' of https://source.denx.de

[PATCH v4 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

Changes in v4: -- - Switched subtree to be imported as dts/upstream sub-directory rather than devicetree-rebasing sub-directory to better suite U-Boot directory structure. - Since we now have v6.7-dts tag available now, so switch subtree to that from its beginning. - Patch #2

Re: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 12:26:13AM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > Comments on NAND stuff only. > > On 1/8/24 12:45, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > *** CID 477216:(BAD_SHIFT) > >

Re: Please pull u-boot-samsung master

g...@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-samsung.git master > > for you to fetch changes up to 5631d20e2ef1008d55569790f79672ea8cc6894b: > > pinctrl: exynos: Convert to use livetree API for fdt access (2023-12-07 > 18:58:48 +0900) > > ---

Re: Please pull u-boot-samsung master

g...@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-samsung.git master > > for you to fetch changes up to 5631d20e2ef1008d55569790f79672ea8cc6894b: > > pinctrl: exynos: Convert to use livetree API for fdt access (2023-12-07 > 18:58:48 +0900) > The change: commit 411094b8afd9553eb34efe

Re: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

Comments on NAND stuff only. On 1/8/24 12:45, Tom Rini wrote: *** CID 477216:(BAD_SHIFT) /drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c: 3921 in nand_flash_detect_onfi() 3915 3916/* 3917

Please pull u-boot-samsung master

Dear Tom, The following changes since commit 2f0282922b2c458eea7f85c500a948a587437b63: Prepare v2024.01-rc4 (2023-12-04 13:46:56 -0500) are available in the git repository at: g...@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-samsung.git master for you to fetch changes up

Re: [v2] Pull request: Please pull u-boot-imx-master-20240108

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:37:09PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Tom, > > This is v2. Fixed the summary log. > > Please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. > > The following changes since commit 93d91e9485d902a1836a22e72d1a545b587adf36: > > Merge branch 'next'

[v2] Pull request: Please pull u-boot-imx-master-20240108

Hi Tom, This is v2. Fixed the summary log. Please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. The following changes since commit 93d91e9485d902a1836a22e72d1a545b587adf36: Merge branch 'next' (2024-01-08 12:00:18 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u

Pull request: Please pull u-boot-imx-master-20240108

Hi Tom, Please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. The following changes since commit 93d91e9485d902a1836a22e72d1a545b587adf36: Merge branch 'next' (2024-01-08 12:00:18 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx.git tags/u-boot-imx-master

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot

. For the hush related issues, this would be a good chance to work with upstream and then backport the changes I suspect. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 12:24 PM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Das U-Boot To: Hi, Please find the latest

Re: [ANN] U-Boot v2024.01 released

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:38:24AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey all, > > It's release day and here's v2024.01. Once again I want to thank > everyone that's contributed to this release, not just in terms of code, > but documentation, testing and otherwise ensuring things go as smoothly > as they

Re: Please pull u-boot-dm/next

On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 05:21:57PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > This is for -next > > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/pipelines/19216 > > https://dev.azure.com/simon0972/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=58=results > > > T

[ANN] U-Boot v2024.01 released

Hey all, It's release day and here's v2024.01. Once again I want to thank everyone that's contributed to this release, not just in terms of code, but documentation, testing and otherwise ensuring things go as smoothly as they can. In terms of a changelog, git log --merges

Please pull u-boot-dm/next

Hi Tom, This is for -next https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/pipelines/19216 https://dev.azure.com/simon0972/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=58=results The following changes since commit c2c598e87cfe56f5991730762c00733c5aa9a994: Merge branch 'staging' of https

Re: Please pull u-boot-tegra staging

tory at: > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tegra.git staging > > for you to fetch changes up to 86e581a5609dc4b2876e5c3e2e458c91879b353c: > > board: htc: endeavoru: add an early SPL RCM hook (2024-01-05 18:05:42 +0200) > Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] sunxi: add Linksprite pcDuino v1/v2 support

تم الإرسال من البريد لـ Windows

Please pull u-boot-tegra staging

Dear Tom, The following changes since commit 4b151562bb8e54160adedbc6a1c0c749c00a2f84: bootmeth: pass size to efi_binary_run() (2023-12-22 10:36:50 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tegra.git staging for you to fetch changes up

Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot env layout

s possible to support U-Boot env data stored > on any kind of NVMEM device. > > For backward compatibility with old DT bindings we need to keep old > NVMEM device driver functional. To avoid code duplication export and > reuse a parsing function. > > Signed-off-by: R

Re: [PATCH u-boot v2019.04-aspeed-openbmc] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add Ampere's BMC platform (AST2600)

0 { + clock-frequency = <8>; + }; + cpu@1 { + clock-frequency = <8>; + }; + }; +}; + + { + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; + status = "okay"; +}; + + { + clock-freque

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

portion and enabled OF_UPSTREAM for SoC instead. - Patch #1, #3, #6 and #8: Picked up review tags Changes in v2: -- - Patch #1: excluded gitab CI config check and added commit description. - Patch #3: s/UBOOT_DTSI_LOC/u_boot_dtsi_loc/ - Patch #4: s/DEVICE_TREE_LOC/dt_dir/ and s/U-boot

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot environment variables layout

On 4.01.2024 08:58, Miquel Raynal wrote: r...@kernel.org wrote on Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:11:29 -0700: On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:34:16PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: From: Rafał Miłecki U-Boot env data is a way of storing firmware variables. It's a format that can be used of top of various

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

Patch #3: s/UBOOT_DTSI_LOC/u_boot_dtsi_loc/ > > - Patch #4: s/DEVICE_TREE_LOC/dt_dir/ and s/U-boot/U-Boot/ > > - Patch #5: s/U-boot/U-Boot/ > > - Patch #6 and #7: Picked up review tags > > > > Prerequisite > > > > > > This patch serie

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot environment variables layout

Hello, r...@kernel.org wrote on Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:11:29 -0700: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:34:16PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > From: Rafał Miłecki > > > > U-Boot env data is a way of storing firmware variables. It's a format > > that can be used of top of v

Re: [PATCH V3 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot environment variables layout

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:34:16PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > U-Boot env data is a way of storing firmware variables. It's a format > that can be used of top of various storage devices. Its binding should > be an NVMEM layout instead of a st

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >